Welcome Guest

If the First Deaths to Wuhan Virus Were in February in Calif

Posted on: April 22, 2020 at 22:21:56 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72409
Member For:
21.47 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
ornia, the Whole Nation Has Been Screwed by the ‘Experts’
April 22, 2020 by streiff

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/04/22/if-the-first-deaths-to-wuhan-virus-were-in-february-in-california-the-whole-nation-has-been-screwed-by-the-experts/

Earlier today, it was reported that the first deaths from Wuhan virus in California took place in early February. This is from my colleague Jennifer van Laar’s post on the news story from earlier today:

Officials in Santa Clara County, California announced Tuesday that the county’s first coronavirus death occurred on February 6, more than a month before previously thought. Prior to the announcement it was believed that the first Wuhan flu death in the United States occurred in Washington State on February 29. The determination was made after tissue samples taken during autopsy were tested by the Centers for Disease Control.

County officials believe that individual’s infection, along with those of two individuals who died February 17 and March 6, originated within the community. Until the autopsy tissue results were received, county health officials believed that the first coronavirus death in Santa Clara occurred on March 9.

This is a huge development in what we know about Wuhan virus and a metaphor for the bill of goods we, as a nation, have been sold about this pandemic. Let’s go to former New York Times reporter, best selling novelist, and out Wuhan skeptic Alex Berenson:


Alex Berenson

@AlexBerenson
· 22h
1/ Okay, this is a big deal. Given the time lag from infection to symptoms to death, it implies that #SARSCoV2 was present in California by mid-January at the latest - but it is very unlikely that the first person to develop #COVID in the US died from it.https://www.axios.com/first-us-coronavirus-death-earlier-autopsy-dbc72f86-30ed-47e5-b5d8-6811643f9853.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=onhrs

A medical Laboratory scientist tests vials for coronavirus at the University of Washington Medicine
Autopsy results show first U.S. coronavirus death earlier than thought
A California patient who died on Feb. 6 was found to have COVID-19.

axios.com

Alex Berenson

@AlexBerenson
2/ Of note, the first known arrival of #COVID in the US has been dated to Jan. 15 in Seattle, and until now the first known death also occurred in Seattle - on Feb. 29 - more than three weeks after this death, on Feb. 6.

340
11:45 PM - Apr 21, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
72 people are talking about this

Alex Berenson

@AlexBerenson
· 22h
Replying to @AlexBerenson
2/ Of note, the first known arrival of #COVID in the US has been dated to Jan. 15 in Seattle, and until now the first known death also occurred in Seattle - on Feb. 29 - more than three weeks after this death, on Feb. 6.


Alex Berenson

@AlexBerenson
3/ So this is yet more evidence #SARSCoV2 has been present for longer and spread wider in the US than previously understood (because the replication cycle is so short and the transmission rate so high, even two weeks could make a 5-15x difference in the number of infections).

Significantly, both the dead people are believed to have contracted the virus from ‘community’ exposure, that is, they were not travelers to China or on a cruise ship. Assuming the person who died first was sick for at least two weeks (typically it takes 5 days for symptoms to show and assuming that the illness progressed normally) before dying at home (this also hints that they didn’t perceive themselves, and weren’t perceived by anyone else, to be sick enough to call 911), they acquired the disease in mid-January. This finding dovetails with the extraordinary levels of exposure to Wuhan noted in Santa Clara and Los Angeles Counties. It also gives credence to the suspicion that the heavy ‘flu season’ was, in fact, Wuhan already present in the US in force in December.

What it also means is that California has had a total of 1,300 fatalities attributed to Wuhan.

It is becoming increasingly obvious that the entire Wuhan lockdown is a grotesque overreaction to a virus that isn’t particularly deadly or virulent. It is becoming equally obvious the models driving this are utter nonsense and the people pushing those models are knowing or, worse, unknowing frauds.

streiff
Managing Editor at RedState
Former infantry officer, CGSC grad and Army Operations Center alumnus.
RedState member since 2004.
polite emails to editoratredstate@gmail.com
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

If the First Deaths to Wuhan Virus Were in February in Calif - JeffB MU - 4/22 22:21:56
     It has been long known the first US case was in mid January - TigerMatt STL - 4/22 22:39:13
          It was way before that (nm) - Sal MU - 4/23 07:28:42
          It has to do with how many infections there are, which affec - JeffB MU - 4/22 22:53:30
               The Santa Clara study, like the now withdrawn Stockholm - TigerMatt STL - 4/22 23:30:46
                    Thanks. Interesting read. I don't know if it is garbage, but - JeffB MU - 4/23 00:04:59
               But unlke the flu - meatiger MU - 4/22 22:58:58
                    The way it hit New York and northern Italy also doesn't seem - JeffB MU - 4/22 23:03:52
                         New York has 20,354 deaths and a population of 19,378,102 - JeffB MU - 4/22 23:14:39
                              One limited study - meatiger MU - 4/22 23:17:51
                                   So how's that work for the general population - Mormad MU - 4/22 23:19:45
                                        I would guess that the infection rate would be quite a bit - JeffB MU - 4/23 00:12:44
                                             I don't see either of those being widespread that quick - meatiger MU - 4/23 00:18:32
                                        a bit tricky - meatiger MU - 4/22 23:28:40
                                             I hope the mortality rate is a lot lower than 4%. (nm) - JeffB MU - 4/23 00:16:19
                                                  that was 0.4%(nm) - meatiger MU - 4/23 00:18:53
                                             Ok, I was about 1/2 that, assuming a 5% infection rate(nm) - Mormad MU - 4/22 23:31:41
                                                  you might be right - meatiger MU - 4/22 23:35:13
                                                       I think it's the great unknown because - Mormad MU - 4/22 23:40:37
                                                            And, we don't yet know whether you can get it again - Mormad MU - 4/22 23:41:45
                                                                 RE: And, we don't yet know whether you can get it again - meatiger MU - 4/22 23:49:08
                         NY is such an outlier - Mormad MU - 4/22 23:07:22
                              But I think it still gives us some valuable data on things - JeffB MU - 4/22 23:51:42
                              Meat packing plants are a problem - meatiger MU - 4/22 23:15:14
     I am mixed on this - meatiger MU - 4/22 22:28:33
          It is confusing, but as you say there are apparently 3 strai - JeffB MU - 4/22 22:36:40
               No there aren't.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/22 22:38:46
                    That's what they are saying here: - JeffB MU - 4/22 22:56:28
                         There aren't three strains. It is based on a - TigerMatt STL - 4/22 23:27:20
                              OK, thanks. (nm) - JeffB MU - 4/23 00:14:51
                         China is now in lockdown in their northern regions - Mormad MU - 4/22 22:57:40
                              It seems quite believable to me. This is very contagious. (nm) - JeffB MU - 4/22 22:58:25




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard