Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: Do you have a link on how the rule is written?(nm)

Posted on: February 19, 2020 at 09:12:35 CT
tigerinhogtown STL
Posts:
64024
Member For:
24.38 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Art. 14. A secondary defender as defined in Rule 4-36 cannot establish initial
legal guarding position in the restricted area for the purpose of drawing an
offensive foul when defending a player who is in control of the ball (i.e.,
dribbling or shooting) or who has released the ball for a pass or try. When illegal
contact occurs within this restricted area, such contact shall be called a blocking
foul, unless the contact is a flagrant foul.
a. When illegal contact occurs by the offensive player leading with a foot or
unnatural, extended knee, or warding off with the arm, such contact shall
be called a player-control foul.
b. When a player in control of the ball stops continuous movement toward
the basket and then initiates illegal contact with a secondary defender in
the restricted area, this is a player control foul.
c. This restriction shall not apply to a secondary defender who establishes
legal guardian position in the Restricted Area Arc and jumps straight up
with arms in legal verticality position and attempts to block a shot.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Just got back from the game...this has probably already... - BandG MU - 2/19 00:35:14
     For at least 10 years now, they have had the stated goal of - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:10:05
          Excellent analysis, especially re hand checks, etc. - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 08:20:29
     It's outrageous. We have to be 20+ points better to win on - zounami MU - 2/19 07:13:19
          Anything our AD says falls on deaf ears Zounami. You know - Uncle John KC - 2/19 07:20:57
               Yes, our incompetent AD is why the problem persists. (nm) - zounami MU - 2/19 08:41:18
                    and Cuonzo's refusal to work the refs doesn't help either (nm) - zounami MU - 2/19 08:41:44
                         I take it you don’t go to games - wu-tangtiger MU - 2/19 09:07:40
                              his current approach isn't working (nm) - zounami MU - 2/19 10:12:59
               Then what about rest of the admin? Or, what about - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 08:22:27
     1:25 left and Braun picks up a foul - Iam4Mizzou MU - 2/19 06:38:23
          His feet were inside the arc, GAT(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/19 06:50:12
               That doesn't make it a foul. that means it can't be - SuperTone MU - 2/19 08:02:29
               then it's a no call. It's not automatically a block if there - MizzouAstro MU - 2/19 07:54:40
               You’re allowed to defend inside the arc - tiger4real MU - 2/19 07:17:05
                    It’s not that you can’t draw a charge, the rule application - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:02:32
                         that cannot be correct - o'lineydisciple MU - 2/19 16:12:01
                         If thst were the case, they missed about 10 ‘fouls’ on the - tiger4real MU - 2/19 08:12:50
                              You disagree that they miss all kinds of shlt? - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:22:37
                                   Do you have a link on how the rule is written?(nm) - tiger4real MU - 2/19 08:27:57
                                        RE: Do you have a link on how the rule is written?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/19 09:12:35
                                             My GOD, what absolute incomprehensible gibberish. - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 10:18:23
               And that is a horrible rule for that exact reason - alwaysright MU - 2/19 07:13:17
                    the rule is fine. The administration of it is sometimes bad - MizzouAstro MU - 2/19 07:55:34
                         Its a useless, idiotic rule, accomplishing NOTHING, except - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 08:00:42
                         That should be a no call, but the rule says it can’t be. - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:00:42
                              Do you have a link that references the language?(nm) - tiger4real MU - 2/19 08:14:50
                              The rule doesn't say it can't be a no call (nm) - kmawv8 MU - 2/19 08:08:35
                                   10 years of application does. It has been called wrong for - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:11:08
                                        That's a completely different point than saying the rule - kmawv8 MU - 2/19 08:18:04
                                             Just posted this above .... - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:25:14
                                                  Give me one example where refs are told to call the - kmawv8 MU - 2/19 08:32:22
                                                       When they tried to clean up carrying a few years back. They - alwaysright MU - 2/19 11:41:24
                                                       Tell me why so often, in a close game at the end, refs - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 10:22:08
                    I think that is the point of the rule - Gavin Citrus MU - 2/19 07:27:07
                         If THAT is the reason the ncaa is even more ****ed up - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 08:01:18
                         Not really, it is called the secondary defender - alwaysright MU - 2/19 07:45:05
                         They wanted to eliminate flops under the basket - tiger4real MU - 2/19 07:44:28
                              Yes but your defensive play better be completely clean - Gavin Citrus MU - 2/19 07:47:04
                                   It says you can’t even play proper post technique defense - alwaysright MU - 2/19 07:59:22
                         And it makes no sense. (nm) - Uncle John KC - 2/19 07:29:58
     that was you booing I guess(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/19 00:38:22
          No I was probably the one dropping F bombs...there was... - BandG MU - 2/19 00:50:12




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard