Welcome Guest

You’re allowed to defend inside the arc

Posted on: February 19, 2020 at 07:17:05 CT

tiger4real MU

Posts:

17597

Member For:

24.35 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

You just can’t draw a charge.

The play in reference was absolutely not a foul. Should’ve been a no call.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Just got back from the game...this has probably already... - BandG MU - 2/19 00:35:14

For at least 10 years now, they have had the stated goal of - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:10:05

Excellent analysis, especially re hand checks, etc. - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 08:20:29

It's outrageous. We have to be 20+ points better to win on - zounami MU - 2/19 07:13:19

Anything our AD says falls on deaf ears Zounami. You know - Uncle John KC - 2/19 07:20:57

Yes, our incompetent AD is why the problem persists. (nm) - zounami MU - 2/19 08:41:18

and Cuonzo's refusal to work the refs doesn't help either (nm) - zounami MU - 2/19 08:41:44

I take it you don’t go to games - wu-tangtiger MU - 2/19 09:07:40

his current approach isn't working (nm) - zounami MU - 2/19 10:12:59

Then what about rest of the admin? Or, what about - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 08:22:27

1:25 left and Braun picks up a foul - Iam4Mizzou MU

- 2/19 06:38:23

His feet were inside the arc, GAT(nm) - hefeweizen MU

- 2/19 06:50:12

That doesn't make it a foul. that means it can't be - SuperTone MU

- 2/19 08:02:29

then it's a no call. It's not automatically a block if there - MizzouAstro MU

- 2/19 07:54:40

You’re allowed to defend inside the arc - tiger4real MU - 2/19 07:17:05

It’s not that you can’t draw a charge, the rule application - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:02:32

that cannot be correct - o'lineydisciple MU - 2/19 16:12:01

If thst were the case, they missed about 10 ‘fouls’ on the - tiger4real MU - 2/19 08:12:50

You disagree that they miss all kinds of shlt? - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:22:37

Do you have a link on how the rule is written?(nm) - tiger4real MU - 2/19 08:27:57

RE: Do you have a link on how the rule is written?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/19 09:12:35

My GOD, what absolute incomprehensible gibberish. - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 10:18:23

And that is a horrible rule for that exact reason - alwaysright MU - 2/19 07:13:17

the rule is fine. The administration of it is sometimes bad - MizzouAstro MU

- 2/19 07:55:34

Its a useless, idiotic rule, accomplishing NOTHING, except - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 08:00:42

That should be a no call, but the rule says it can’t be. - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:00:42

Do you have a link that references the language?(nm) - tiger4real MU - 2/19 08:14:50

The rule doesn't say it can't be a no call (nm) - kmawv8 MU - 2/19 08:08:35

10 years of application does. It has been called wrong for - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:11:08

That's a completely different point than saying the rule - kmawv8 MU - 2/19 08:18:04

Just posted this above .... - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:25:14

Give me one example where refs are told to call the - kmawv8 MU - 2/19 08:32:22

When they tried to clean up carrying a few years back. They - alwaysright MU - 2/19 11:41:24

Tell me why so often, in a close game at the end, refs - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 10:22:08

I think that is the point of the rule - Gavin Citrus MU - 2/19 07:27:07

If THAT is the reason the ncaa is even more ****ed up - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 08:01:18

Not really, it is called the secondary defender - alwaysright MU - 2/19 07:45:05

They wanted to eliminate flops under the basket - tiger4real MU - 2/19 07:44:28

Yes but your defensive play better be completely clean - Gavin Citrus MU - 2/19 07:47:04

It says you can’t even play proper post technique defense - alwaysright MU - 2/19 07:59:22

And it makes no sense. (nm) - Uncle John KC - 2/19 07:29:58

that was you booing I guess(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/19 00:38:22

No I was probably the one dropping F bombs...there was... - BandG MU - 2/19 00:50:12