Welcome Guest

Not really, it is called the secondary defender

Posted on: February 19, 2020 at 07:45:05 CT

alwaysright MU

Posts:

52895

Member For:

18.14 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Rule so that back side help can’t jump in under an airborne player.

That was the original rationale, but that’s not how it’s being used

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Just got back from the game...this has probably already... - BandG MU - 2/19 00:35:14

For at least 10 years now, they have had the stated goal of - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:10:05

Excellent analysis, especially re hand checks, etc. - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 08:20:29

It's outrageous. We have to be 20+ points better to win on - zounami MU - 2/19 07:13:19

Anything our AD says falls on deaf ears Zounami. You know - Uncle John KC - 2/19 07:20:57

Yes, our incompetent AD is why the problem persists. (nm) - zounami MU - 2/19 08:41:18

and Cuonzo's refusal to work the refs doesn't help either (nm) - zounami MU - 2/19 08:41:44

I take it you don’t go to games - wu-tangtiger MU - 2/19 09:07:40

his current approach isn't working (nm) - zounami MU - 2/19 10:12:59

Then what about rest of the admin? Or, what about - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 08:22:27

1:25 left and Braun picks up a foul - Iam4Mizzou MU

- 2/19 06:38:23

His feet were inside the arc, GAT(nm) - hefeweizen MU

- 2/19 06:50:12

That doesn't make it a foul. that means it can't be - SuperTone MU

- 2/19 08:02:29

then it's a no call. It's not automatically a block if there - MizzouAstro MU

- 2/19 07:54:40

You’re allowed to defend inside the arc - tiger4real MU - 2/19 07:17:05

It’s not that you can’t draw a charge, the rule application - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:02:32

that cannot be correct - o'lineydisciple MU - 2/19 16:12:01

If thst were the case, they missed about 10 ‘fouls’ on the - tiger4real MU - 2/19 08:12:50

You disagree that they miss all kinds of shlt? - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:22:37

Do you have a link on how the rule is written?(nm) - tiger4real MU - 2/19 08:27:57

RE: Do you have a link on how the rule is written?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/19 09:12:35

My GOD, what absolute incomprehensible gibberish. - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 10:18:23

And that is a horrible rule for that exact reason - alwaysright MU - 2/19 07:13:17

the rule is fine. The administration of it is sometimes bad - MizzouAstro MU

- 2/19 07:55:34

Its a useless, idiotic rule, accomplishing NOTHING, except - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 08:00:42

That should be a no call, but the rule says it can’t be. - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:00:42

Do you have a link that references the language?(nm) - tiger4real MU - 2/19 08:14:50

The rule doesn't say it can't be a no call (nm) - kmawv8 MU - 2/19 08:08:35

10 years of application does. It has been called wrong for - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:11:08

That's a completely different point than saying the rule - kmawv8 MU - 2/19 08:18:04

Just posted this above .... - alwaysright MU - 2/19 08:25:14

Give me one example where refs are told to call the - kmawv8 MU - 2/19 08:32:22

When they tried to clean up carrying a few years back. They - alwaysright MU - 2/19 11:41:24

Tell me why so often, in a close game at the end, refs - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 10:22:08

I think that is the point of the rule - Gavin Citrus MU - 2/19 07:27:07

If THAT is the reason the ncaa is even more ****ed up - GA Tiger MU - 2/19 08:01:18

Not really, it is called the secondary defender - alwaysright MU - 2/19 07:45:05

They wanted to eliminate flops under the basket - tiger4real MU - 2/19 07:44:28

Yes but your defensive play better be completely clean - Gavin Citrus MU - 2/19 07:47:04

It says you can’t even play proper post technique defense - alwaysright MU - 2/19 07:59:22

And it makes no sense. (nm) - Uncle John KC - 2/19 07:29:58

that was you booing I guess(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/19 00:38:22

No I was probably the one dropping F bombs...there was... - BandG MU - 2/19 00:50:12