Damn. Not used to intelligent questions from a lib.
Posted on: September 21, 2017 at 20:58:47 CT
GA Tiger MU
Posts:
252418
Member For:
26.30 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Seriously. But here's a start. Actually a summary of my arguments: There will NEVER be enough money to treat everyone for all their ailments all the time. Yet that is what the dems try to do and what the repubs pretend to do. Therefore it is impossible to create a HC plan that over half the people will accept.
Not saying it couldn't be done much better than what we do, but given US demographics, its size and its divisions, you'll never see a plan nearly as good as it might be.
Why? Given limited resources it is essential that the pols do something they've never done (and won't) which is to set priorities for who gets the money. That means saying who does NOT get it, try to sell that idea and proceed from there.
HC is SO much more expensive than it needs to be. We badly need tort reform, because doctors admit they prescribe tests, lab work and surgery that isn't needed simply to keep lawyers away. And your democrats for decades refuse to even consider tort reform. Fraud from all the gov't programs eats up money. End of life care, when doctors know a person won't live over another year is extremely expensive and IMO unwarranted. Illegals get medical care. People with totally irresponsible life styles, like willful drug addicts and the morbidly obese, get medical care. The influx now of huge amounts of money from a 3rd party, especially gov't, has added to large increased costs of doctors, drugs and hospitals. Gov't mandated ins., for stuff many people don't need at all, adds a huge cost.
And so on. I might add that there is nothing I mentioned that a democrat, certainly the pols, would support. So my question is....why not?
Edited by GA Tiger at 21:04:06 on 09/21/17