pseudo scientists (political scientists) and believed by pseudo intellectuals is merely opinions of one thing used to, “prove“ their opinions on other things.
There is nothing scientific in this article. It attempts demonstrate how, since they state as fact that trees are social constructs, obviously race and sex are similarly constructed by humans to fill in the need for information. Sorry stupid, trees existed before they were named by people. The naming of something is not actually constructing it.
It already existed.
And then, liberal pseudo intellectuals take another step to amaze, astound and abuse the gullible. A decent argument can be made that nations are in fact constructed by people. Nations were created, they did not exist in nature. They take this truism and use it to prove that races are also constructed by men.
That is like saying that since man created automobiles, man also created the penis. Which proves that sex is a social construct. Swamp rat, 90 and of course The Idiot are all stupid enough to believe this. It appears in a pseudo scientific journal for deep thinkers. Or rather shallow thinkers who are out of their depth.
This is what passes for intellectual thought today. Make shlt up, proclaim your opinions to be facts. And then base other absurdities on your original opinions and state everything as scientific fact. One made up fact proves the next one. This is pitiful.
The article says that we don’t believe that about men and women anymore. Yes stupid, we do. Intelligent people do. Make believe scientists who believe their own lies, no longer believe that. That’s because they are stupid.
This is the article that swamp rat posted to prove his point about social constructs. It’s pathetic. It’s pitiful. It’s a swamp rat.
https://www.verywellmind.com/definition-of-social-construct-1448922Edited by hokie at 08:34:51 on 03/17/21