Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: Amy Cony Barrett INCINERATES Ketanji Brown -

Posted on: June 28, 2025 at 11:41:11 CT
BH O'bonga MU
Posts:
26464
Member For:
5.64 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Note that ACB begins with the word "we" and she was joined by six other Justices, including both of the others appointed by democrat Presidents.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Amy Cony Barrett INCINERATES Ketanji Brown - - tmcats KSU - 6/28 10:47:17
     LOL the Supreme Corrupt gave the green light to - JG A - 6/28 15:32:21
     Welcome to yesterday - Wildcat KSU - 6/28 12:54:29
     RE: Amy Cony Barrett INCINERATES Ketanji Brown - - BH O'bonga MU - 6/28 11:41:11
     ACB is one step above Jackson - El-ahrairah BAMA - 6/28 11:10:06
          Jackson and Sotomayor are idiots. Even lefty Laurence Tribe - blake1771 MU - 6/28 11:23:41
     ACB is wrong. The judiciary can only weigh in on cases - TigerMatt STL - 6/28 10:52:58
          just a few threads ago, you don't even believe in - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 15:18:28
          Partly right - sks MU - 6/28 13:09:20
               Did the founding fathers want courts - Newcatbirdseat MU - 6/28 15:18:51
          RE: ACB is wrong. The judiciary can only weigh in on cases - JangoFett MU - 6/28 12:17:40
          My God, please get help for your mental illness.(nm) - hangman MU - 6/28 12:16:06
          RE: ACB is wrong. The judiciary can only weigh in on cases - BH O'bonga MU - 6/28 11:42:28
          Roe vs Wade , remember that? Made abortion legal everywhere - RHAYWORTH MU - 6/28 11:31:26
               Roe v Wade wasn’t a law. And Congress had decades to write a - TigerMatt STL - 6/28 15:59:44
                    RE: Roe v Wade wasn’t a law. And Congress had decades to write a - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:08:20
          i'll ask for pickle - can you point out in the constitution - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 11:18:50
               Explicitly it is not. Federalist 78 is the context.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 6/28 15:57:53
                    no $hit. there's other context as well, Matt (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:08:50
                         Most of the power government claims isn’t explicit. They - TigerMatt STL - 6/28 16:26:03
                              and b/c the feds (the Judiciary) now have absolute power ove - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:45:14
                              yeah (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:44:38
               Oh, so now you care about the Constitution again - Seagull MU - 6/28 14:06:33
                    no, not at all my point, but Matt made it his point. - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 14:50:17
               Article 3 Section 2 - haeffb MU - 6/28 13:53:24
                    sorry haeff, it was a reference to the judiciary stealing th - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 14:50:55
                         Stealing? - haeffb MU - 6/28 15:23:36
                              note: philosophically, you now have the feds deciding if th - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:11:17
                              The states. you missed the only correct option. - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 15:56:06
                                   Crackpot option, you mean. - haeffb MU - 6/28 16:12:57
                                        it's funny (ironic) that it was federal tariffs that led to - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:25:28
                                             No, I woudn’t have been on the side of - haeffb MU - 6/28 16:39:11
                                                  oh, my (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:45:43
                                        I don't have to. Everything not empowered to the Feds is - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:18:18
                                             What do these words mean? - haeffb MU - 6/28 16:29:59
                                                  it doesn't matter any more, haeff. you made it clear with - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:46:52
                                                       I have no interest in the dissolution of the Union. - haeffb MU - 6/28 16:58:47
                                                            that's not the dissolution of the union, haeff, you're just - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 17:42:34
                                                                 When 25 states disagree with the other 25 - haeffb MU - 6/28 18:18:23
                                                                      I don't know, you tell me. Probably a violent revolution (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 19:38:34
                                                                           or, it may require a number of the states to nullify. I'm s - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 19:42:53
                                                                                I don’t support unlimited Federal power. - haeffb MU - 6/28 20:27:48
          Lol she wasn't talking imperial like star wars - NPDTiger MU - 6/28 11:08:53
          yeah, roe v. wade was just an illusion(nm) - tmcats KSU - 6/28 11:08:10
          The judiciary can most definitely be imperial. By choosing - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/28 11:05:19
               They don’t/didn’t have veto power. - haeffb MU - 6/28 13:55:57
                    it is in practice, as we've seen - which was precisely why - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 14:56:05
                         Or the numbers are all BS. Counting ICE encounters at 8.5 - TigerMatt STL - 6/28 16:22:01
                              ok (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:52:59
                         No, we haven’t seen. - haeffb MU - 6/28 15:38:39
                              There are a lot of injunctions and an orchestrated manner to - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:12:04
     again, jeez - SwampTiger MU - 6/28 10:48:48
          i remember many here demeaning amy's appointment(nm) - tmcats KSU - 6/28 10:50:15
               As they should have(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 6/28 12:55:45
               and still do (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 6/28 11:46:57
               yes, overall, she's been a disappointment. - blake1771 MU - 6/28 11:32:07




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard