Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Amy Cony Barrett INCINERATES Ketanji Brown -

Posted on: June 28, 2025 at 10:47:17 CT
tmcats KSU
Posts:
39963
Member For:
25.62 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
“We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.“
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Amy Cony Barrett INCINERATES Ketanji Brown - - tmcats KSU - 6/28 10:47:17
     LOL the Supreme Corrupt gave the green light to - JG A - 6/28 15:32:21
     Welcome to yesterday - Wildcat KSU - 6/28 12:54:29
     RE: Amy Cony Barrett INCINERATES Ketanji Brown - - BH O'bonga MU - 6/28 11:41:11
     ACB is one step above Jackson - El-ahrairah BAMA - 6/28 11:10:06
          Jackson and Sotomayor are idiots. Even lefty Laurence Tribe - blake1771 MU - 6/28 11:23:41
     ACB is wrong. The judiciary can only weigh in on cases - TigerMatt STL - 6/28 10:52:58
          just a few threads ago, you don't even believe in - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 15:18:28
          Partly right - sks MU - 6/28 13:09:20
               Did the founding fathers want courts - Newcatbirdseat MU - 6/28 15:18:51
          RE: ACB is wrong. The judiciary can only weigh in on cases - JangoFett MU - 6/28 12:17:40
          My God, please get help for your mental illness.(nm) - hangman MU - 6/28 12:16:06
          RE: ACB is wrong. The judiciary can only weigh in on cases - BH O'bonga MU - 6/28 11:42:28
          Roe vs Wade , remember that? Made abortion legal everywhere - RHAYWORTH MU - 6/28 11:31:26
               Roe v Wade wasn’t a law. And Congress had decades to write a - TigerMatt STL - 6/28 15:59:44
                    RE: Roe v Wade wasn’t a law. And Congress had decades to write a - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:08:20
          i'll ask for pickle - can you point out in the constitution - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 11:18:50
               Explicitly it is not. Federalist 78 is the context.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 6/28 15:57:53
                    no $hit. there's other context as well, Matt (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:08:50
                         Most of the power government claims isn’t explicit. They - TigerMatt STL - 6/28 16:26:03
                              and b/c the feds (the Judiciary) now have absolute power ove - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:45:14
                              yeah (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:44:38
               Oh, so now you care about the Constitution again - Seagull MU - 6/28 14:06:33
                    no, not at all my point, but Matt made it his point. - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 14:50:17
               Article 3 Section 2 - haeffb MU - 6/28 13:53:24
                    sorry haeff, it was a reference to the judiciary stealing th - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 14:50:55
                         Stealing? - haeffb MU - 6/28 15:23:36
                              note: philosophically, you now have the feds deciding if th - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:11:17
                              The states. you missed the only correct option. - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 15:56:06
                                   Crackpot option, you mean. - haeffb MU - 6/28 16:12:57
                                        it's funny (ironic) that it was federal tariffs that led to - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:25:28
                                             No, I woudn’t have been on the side of - haeffb MU - 6/28 16:39:11
                                                  oh, my (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:45:43
                                        I don't have to. Everything not empowered to the Feds is - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:18:18
                                             What do these words mean? - haeffb MU - 6/28 16:29:59
                                                  it doesn't matter any more, haeff. you made it clear with - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:46:52
                                                       I have no interest in the dissolution of the Union. - haeffb MU - 6/28 16:58:47
                                                            that's not the dissolution of the union, haeff, you're just - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 17:42:34
                                                                 When 25 states disagree with the other 25 - haeffb MU - 6/28 18:18:23
                                                                      I don't know, you tell me. Probably a violent revolution (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 19:38:34
                                                                           or, it may require a number of the states to nullify. I'm s - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 19:42:53
                                                                                I don’t support unlimited Federal power. - haeffb MU - 6/28 20:27:48
          Lol she wasn't talking imperial like star wars - NPDTiger MU - 6/28 11:08:53
          yeah, roe v. wade was just an illusion(nm) - tmcats KSU - 6/28 11:08:10
          The judiciary can most definitely be imperial. By choosing - DHighlander NWMSU - 6/28 11:05:19
               They don’t/didn’t have veto power. - haeffb MU - 6/28 13:55:57
                    it is in practice, as we've seen - which was precisely why - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 14:56:05
                         Or the numbers are all BS. Counting ICE encounters at 8.5 - TigerMatt STL - 6/28 16:22:01
                              ok (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:52:59
                         No, we haven’t seen. - haeffb MU - 6/28 15:38:39
                              There are a lot of injunctions and an orchestrated manner to - 90Tiger STL - 6/28 16:12:04
     again, jeez - SwampTiger MU - 6/28 10:48:48
          i remember many here demeaning amy's appointment(nm) - tmcats KSU - 6/28 10:50:15
               As they should have(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 6/28 12:55:45
               and still do (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 6/28 11:46:57
               yes, overall, she's been a disappointment. - blake1771 MU - 6/28 11:32:07




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard