Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No. No national control of elections. (nm)

Posted on: November 14, 2021 at 18:32:49 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44902
Member For:
13.46 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Would you support a Constitutional Amendment on voting - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/14 15:44:50
     sounds like another big government demlib solution (nm) - ashtray UF - 11/14 18:35:21
     No. No national control of elections. (nm) - ummmm MU - 11/14 18:32:49
     No(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/14 17:02:43
     that is not "simple"...lol(nm) - meatiger MU - 11/14 16:06:08
          Pelosi's read it to know what's in it is not "simple"... - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/14 16:22:05
          It sure as hell ought to be. Nm - hokie VT - 11/14 16:14:30
               States run elections - meatiger MU - 11/14 16:20:59
                    A constitutional amendment would change that idiot. - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/14 16:29:17
                         There is only one federal election. President. - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/14 16:34:31
                              Never heard of the House and Senate? If you argue that - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/14 16:43:12
                                   President is the only office voted for by people of all - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/14 23:46:11
                                   Exactly - meatiger MU - 11/14 16:49:04
                                        Again not advocating for it but a constitutional amendment - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/14 16:54:02
                                             yes - meatiger MU - 11/14 16:55:34
                                                  And a constitutional amendment can do all those things as - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/14 17:08:59
                                                       Interesting how both sides - meatiger MU - 11/14 17:23:09
                                                            All the right tried to do in 2020 was force states to follow - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/14 17:57:21
                                                                 How someone else votes - meatiger MU - 11/14 18:24:33
                                                                      A legally cat and counted vote does not. If you allow other - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/14 18:44:18
                                                                           There is no personal right to an election - meatiger MU - 11/14 20:38:48
                                                                                There is a personal right to election integrity under the - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/14 23:47:57
     Yes. And the same should be required for state and local - hokie VT - 11/14 16:01:30
          why do you hate the Founders and America? (nm) - pickle MU - 11/14 16:03:33
               The Founders of the United States of America VOTED for - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/14 16:32:36
                    the founders didn't want an all powerful federal govt - ashtray UF - 11/14 18:38:30
                         Your false interpretation of my intention does not define - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/14 23:34:22
                              that's how it might start, but it would only lead to more - ashtray UF - 11/15 08:51:04
                                   That isn't the slippery slope, that you are trying to - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/15 18:44:38
     no (nm) - pickle MU - 11/14 16:01:14
     No - El-ahrairah BAMA - 11/14 15:52:25




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard