Welcome Guest

Yes and no.

Posted on: June 27, 2022 at 10:38:07 CT
GA Tiger MU
Posts:
252576
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Best answer I know.

Last year, the House of Representatives, controlled by the Democratic Party, voted to approve legislation that would secure - and, in some cases expand - the right to abortion afforded by the Roe decision. The vote was 218 in favour and 211 against.

The bill then moved to the evenly-divided Senate, where one Democrat - Joe Manchin of West Virginia - joined the Republicans in voting it down. Because of Senate rules that several Democrats (including Mr Manchin) are adamantly against altering, passage would have required 60 votes out of the 100 senators - a mark the abortion bill did not approach.

With the draft opinion leak, Democrats will renew their efforts to pass legal abortion protections that would stop the dozens of states poised to ban the procedure.

Leaders in the House could scale back the scope of their proposal in an attempt to woo Senate Republicans sympathetic to abortion rights, such as Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. They could again try to change Senate rules to allow a simple majority vote to approve legislation - an effort that was unsuccessful during a voting-rights fight last year.

They could also move forward with proposals to add new (presumably liberal) justices to an expanded Supreme Court or try to impeach and remove Donald Trump-appointed Supreme Court justices - like Brett Kavanaugh - who noted the significance of Roe's 50-year precedent and now are at least entertaining the notion of striking the decision down.

The chances of success on such measures range from slim to remote in the extreme - that puts even more pressure on Democrats to win congressional elections in the autumn. And, if Republicans take back at least partial control of Congress instead, the door will firmly shut on Democratic hopes of a national legislative response to Roe's demise.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

stupid Roe v Wade question - o'lineydisciple MU - 6/27 10:17:23
     Legal scholars have argued that for years. Congress of - hokie VT - 6/27 11:13:28
          Um, they voted on it last month. (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 6/27 11:26:04
               the senate didn't (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 6/27 12:27:16
     That would be unconstitutional. - ummmm MU - 6/27 10:53:55
          but is it though? - o'lineydisciple MU - 6/27 11:44:05
               Great point. Glad there's a few thinkers still around.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 6/27 11:56:32
               You got your answer yesterday and today - pickle MU - 6/27 11:51:14
          Here's something you ignore. - GA Tiger MU - 6/27 10:57:33
               for example? (nm) - pickle MU - 6/27 11:00:54
               SCOTUS cannot give a power to Congress under the - ummmm MU - 6/27 10:58:36
     Yes and no. - GA Tiger MU - 6/27 10:38:07
          where did you copy/paste that from? (nm) - pickle MU - 6/27 10:48:21
               Likely BBC. (nm) - DC Jayhawk KU - 6/27 10:49:39
                    Yes.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 6/27 10:50:50
                         what were some of the other answers? (nm) - pickle MU - 6/27 10:52:43
               Internet. - GA Tiger MU - 6/27 10:49:21
                    where did you copy/paste that from? (nm) - pickle MU - 6/27 10:49:50
                         You have already started to bore the hell out of me. - GA Tiger MU - 6/27 10:54:54
     Where do they have that power? - Spanky KU - 6/27 10:25:48
          Right here - pickle MU - 6/27 10:31:49
               Try again(nm) - tman MU - 6/27 10:42:30
               Can you cite the Tigerboard guideline - mizzouSECedes STL - 6/27 10:37:51
                    no - pickle MU - 6/27 10:49:21
                         Good deal, so is mine. - mizzouSECedes STL - 6/27 11:00:59
                              your post wasn’t political - pickle MU - 6/27 11:09:25
                                   lol, you're confused (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 6/27 11:10:51
                                        nope (nm) - pickle MU - 6/27 11:25:16
          that seldom stops them (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 6/27 10:26:52
     Yes, congress should do their ****ing job(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 6/27 10:25:43
     few in congress want to vote on it (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 6/27 10:25:31
     RE: stupid Roe v Wade question - pickle MU - 6/27 10:21:54
     Not based on this ruling. Said in essence it is - tman MU - 6/27 10:20:06
          would this current court - meatiger MU - 6/27 11:05:05
               I think they would. That would be a consistent - tman MU - 6/27 11:27:20
                    the court for several years has not been consistent - meatiger MU - 6/27 11:33:00
          no, the court said the the previous court had no right - tigerinhogtown STL - 6/27 10:45:17
               Have you actually read the opinion. It isn't a long one - tman MU - 6/27 10:49:46
                    yes, given this conclusion, where am I wrong? - tigerinhogtown STL - 6/27 11:47:21
          In the absence of federal legislation it is - Mormad MU - 6/27 10:23:20
               They basically said Congress has no authority here - tman MU - 6/27 10:41:07
                    It would be an interesting debate - Mormad MU - 6/27 10:44:39
                         Exactly, which in my opinion is a good thing(nm) - tman MU - 6/27 10:54:56
                              I think it's one thing to make a ruling in a limited area - Mormad MU - 6/27 10:59:32
                                   They wrote the opinion in that manner, but - tman MU - 6/27 11:04:49
                                        Don't disagree, it's kind of like the 24 hour newscycle - Mormad MU - 6/27 11:21:59




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard