Welcome Guest

stupid Roe v Wade question

Posted on: June 27, 2022 at 10:17:23 CT

o'lineydisciple MU

Posts:

6916

Member For:

26.27 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Could congress not just introduce a bill that legalizes abortion (in certain circumstances)?

Didn't Obama campaign partly on that in 2008?

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

stupid Roe v Wade question - o'lineydisciple MU - 6/27 10:17:23

Legal scholars have argued that for years. Congress of - hokie VT - 6/27 11:13:28

Um, they voted on it last month. (nm) - hefeweizen MU

- 6/27 11:26:04

the senate didn't (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 6/27 12:27:16

That would be unconstitutional. - ummmm MU - 6/27 10:53:55

but is it though? - o'lineydisciple MU - 6/27 11:44:05

Great point. Glad there's a few thinkers still around.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 6/27 11:56:32

You got your answer yesterday and today - pickle MU

- 6/27 11:51:14

Here's something you ignore. - GA Tiger MU - 6/27 10:57:33

for example? (nm) - pickle MU

- 6/27 11:00:54

SCOTUS cannot give a power to Congress under the - ummmm MU - 6/27 10:58:36

Yes and no. - GA Tiger MU - 6/27 10:38:07

where did you copy/paste that from? (nm) - pickle MU

- 6/27 10:48:21

Likely BBC. (nm) - DC Jayhawk KU - 6/27 10:49:39

Yes.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 6/27 10:50:50

what were some of the other answers? (nm) - pickle MU

- 6/27 10:52:43

Internet. - GA Tiger MU - 6/27 10:49:21

where did you copy/paste that from? (nm) - pickle MU

- 6/27 10:49:50

You have already started to bore the hell out of me. - GA Tiger MU - 6/27 10:54:54

Where do they have that power? - Spanky KU - 6/27 10:25:48

Right here - pickle MU

- 6/27 10:31:49

Try again(nm) - tman MU - 6/27 10:42:30

Can you cite the Tigerboard guideline - mizzouSECedes STL - 6/27 10:37:51

no - pickle MU

- 6/27 10:49:21

Good deal, so is mine. - mizzouSECedes STL - 6/27 11:00:59

your post wasn’t political - pickle MU

- 6/27 11:09:25

lol, you're confused (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 6/27 11:10:51

nope (nm) - pickle MU

- 6/27 11:25:16

that seldom stops them (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 6/27 10:26:52

Yes, congress should do their ****ing job(nm) - hefeweizen MU

- 6/27 10:25:43

few in congress want to vote on it (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 6/27 10:25:31

RE: stupid Roe v Wade question - pickle MU

- 6/27 10:21:54

Not based on this ruling. Said in essence it is - tman MU - 6/27 10:20:06

would this current court - meatiger MU - 6/27 11:05:05

I think they would. That would be a consistent - tman MU - 6/27 11:27:20

the court for several years has not been consistent - meatiger MU - 6/27 11:33:00

no, the court said the the previous court had no right - tigerinhogtown STL - 6/27 10:45:17

Have you actually read the opinion. It isn't a long one - tman MU - 6/27 10:49:46

yes, given this conclusion, where am I wrong? - tigerinhogtown STL - 6/27 11:47:21

In the absence of federal legislation it is - Mormad MU - 6/27 10:23:20

They basically said Congress has no authority here - tman MU - 6/27 10:41:07

It would be an interesting debate - Mormad MU - 6/27 10:44:39

Exactly, which in my opinion is a good thing(nm) - tman MU - 6/27 10:54:56

I think it's one thing to make a ruling in a limited area - Mormad MU - 6/27 10:59:32

They wrote the opinion in that manner, but - tman MU - 6/27 11:04:49

Don't disagree, it's kind of like the 24 hour newscycle - Mormad MU - 6/27 11:21:59