Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

how many Democrats have no involvement?

Posted on: October 24, 2019 at 11:07:30 CT
mgtiger MU
Posts:
4722
Member For:
26.32 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The rules are the same for both parties. It is you that needs to take off the misinformation glasses.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Judge Nap shuts down all the trumptard conspiracy - MrBlueSky MU - 10/24 09:26:46
     GOP counts on stupid people - JayHoaxH8r MU - 10/24 11:03:36
     So is it an impeachment inquiry or not? (nm) - Sal MU - 10/24 10:05:20
          what did the judge say? operating rules being followed. - mgtiger MU - 10/24 10:22:25
               Nap specifically said Boehner - Sal MU - 10/24 10:25:26
                    so listen to the judge - mgtiger MU - 10/24 10:28:43
                         I never said he was correct or incorrect - Sal MU - 10/24 10:30:52
                              moot point - mgtiger MU - 10/24 10:37:45
                                   Asking for details isn't a moot point(nm) - Sal MU - 10/24 10:38:27
                                        yes it is - mgtiger MU - 10/24 11:06:00
                                        LOL - Ace AU - 10/24 10:44:39
          Inquiry...not proceedings. - Mormad MU - 10/24 10:22:21
               If it was truly PR - JayHoaxH8r MU - 10/24 11:08:45
               I'd say it's somewhere between what you said - Sal MU - 10/24 10:24:53
     That is sure good stuff there(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/24 10:01:30
     47 republicans are on the 3 committees having hearings - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/24 09:39:48
          And how many have no involvement - tman MU - 10/24 10:12:03
               how many Democrats have no involvement? - mgtiger MU - 10/24 11:07:30
          LOL the derp squad stormed - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/24 09:56:12
          Why does your side never learn? All it has to do is look - tcat KC - 10/24 09:44:27
               Impeachment IS a political process - raskolnikov MU - 10/24 10:07:48
                    Never intended to be political. Do you agree?(nm) - tman MU - 10/24 10:12:54
                         No, it was designed to be political - not partican, but - raskolnikov MU - 10/24 10:25:19
                         I think it was always intended to be political - Mormad MU - 10/24 10:14:51
                              Read the Federalist papers and let me know what you think(nm) - tman MU - 10/24 10:17:20
                                   Don't confuse political with partisan(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/24 10:25:47
                                   I've read some of them, and as I stated earlier - Mormad MU - 10/24 10:20:45
               The stunt yesterday was dumb. I mean that was a Gaetz - Mormad MU - 10/24 09:49:09
                    Half the stormers were allowed to be present - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/24 10:02:44
                    Scalise, #2 in the House, spoke at the same podium - Ace AU - 10/24 09:50:36
                         Jordan, I'm not surprised. He's a WH water carrier. - Mormad MU - 10/24 09:51:28
                              RE: Jordan, I'm not surprised. He's a WH water carrier. - Ace AU - 10/24 10:02:01
          lol (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/24 09:43:37
     RE: Judge Nap only serves to feed the anti-Trump frenzy. - None**** MU - 10/24 09:36:38
          You have him confused with Judge Jeanine...fox's other - tigerdb MU - 10/24 09:41:16
               RE: You have him confused with Judge Jeanine. No I don't. - None**** MU - 10/24 09:43:10
                    Why the fvck are you lying? He was a NJ superior court - tigerdb MU - 10/24 09:46:46
                         lying or misinformed - mgtiger MU - 10/24 10:06:37
                              willfully ignorant (nm) - pickle MU - 10/24 10:14:14
                                   you're being too generous, in this case. (nm) - tigerdb MU - 10/24 10:23:12
                                   or willfully misinformed - mgtiger MU - 10/24 10:15:43
                              Yes, - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/24 10:09:44
                              No - he's a liar. - tigerdb MU - 10/24 10:08:47
                                   agreed - mgtiger MU - 10/24 10:13:37
          And you are?? - Ace AU - 10/24 09:40:23
          What did he say that IYO is incorrect?(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 10/24 09:38:58
          you would stand to learn a lot from him - pickle MU - 10/24 09:38:38
     Time for billy barr to meet with murdoch again - tigerdb MU - 10/24 09:36:29
     Has anyone said it's a conspiracy? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/24 09:34:40
          The conspiracy that Republicans are being shut out of the - MrBlueSky MU - 10/24 09:35:06
               lol yep another BlueSky moment - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/24 09:45:00
               The issue isn't one of conspriacy - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 10/24 09:36:36
                    If the information is leaked, don't they know it? - Mormad MU - 10/24 09:38:45
                         They know some of what is happening - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 10/24 09:42:42
                              No - they know EVERYTHING that is happening. - tigerdb MU - 10/24 09:58:25
                                   But they are forbidden from speaking of what goes on - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 10/24 10:04:29
                                        so, the same thing that happened during the benghazie/ - tigerdb MU - 10/24 10:06:27
                                             were those an impeachment inquiry? - Sal MU - 10/24 10:10:04
                                                  Did Bengazhi actuallyninvolve classified information(nm) - tman MU - 10/24 10:14:55
     So you don't care that it looks bad and might be - tcat KC - 10/24 09:33:01
          13 of the Republicans who participated in the little "raid" - MrBlueSky MU - 10/24 09:34:03
               I think you mean stunt, but it should be public - tcat KC - 10/24 09:41:27
                    Why would the investigative stage of an inquiry be public? (nm) - Mo Texan MU - 10/24 09:47:15
                         Because we were told this is a political action not criminal - tcat KC - 10/24 09:51:20
                              Investigative actions are not public regardless - Mo Texan MU - 10/24 11:04:33
                              TIL the investigations in prior impeachments were - MrBlueSky MU - 10/24 09:53:52
                                   But the non public parts of prior impeachments were - tcat KC - 10/24 10:00:28
                              Both previous impeachment efforts had a private component - Mormad MU - 10/24 09:52:24
                                   But didn't they make that public info when made the rules - tcat KC - 10/24 09:57:33
                                        Before the vote, once they've gathered whatever evidence - Mormad MU - 10/24 09:59:45
     But but but they don't allow ANY republicans in the room!!! - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/24 09:30:28
          It does, but you don't care about that. ORANGE MAN BAD (nm) - tcat KC - 10/24 09:33:52




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard