Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Both previous impeachment efforts had a private component

Posted on: October 24, 2019 at 09:52:24 CT
Mormad MU
Posts:
56694
Member For:
18.70 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
just through a special prosecutor, or impeachment counsel, rather than the House.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Judge Nap shuts down all the trumptard conspiracy - MrBlueSky MU - 10/24 09:26:46
     GOP counts on stupid people - JayHoaxH8r MU - 10/24 11:03:36
     So is it an impeachment inquiry or not? (nm) - Sal MU - 10/24 10:05:20
          what did the judge say? operating rules being followed. - mgtiger MU - 10/24 10:22:25
               Nap specifically said Boehner - Sal MU - 10/24 10:25:26
                    so listen to the judge - mgtiger MU - 10/24 10:28:43
                         I never said he was correct or incorrect - Sal MU - 10/24 10:30:52
                              moot point - mgtiger MU - 10/24 10:37:45
                                   Asking for details isn't a moot point(nm) - Sal MU - 10/24 10:38:27
                                        yes it is - mgtiger MU - 10/24 11:06:00
                                        LOL - Ace AU - 10/24 10:44:39
          Inquiry...not proceedings. - Mormad MU - 10/24 10:22:21
               If it was truly PR - JayHoaxH8r MU - 10/24 11:08:45
               I'd say it's somewhere between what you said - Sal MU - 10/24 10:24:53
     That is sure good stuff there(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/24 10:01:30
     47 republicans are on the 3 committees having hearings - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/24 09:39:48
          And how many have no involvement - tman MU - 10/24 10:12:03
               how many Democrats have no involvement? - mgtiger MU - 10/24 11:07:30
          LOL the derp squad stormed - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/24 09:56:12
          Why does your side never learn? All it has to do is look - tcat KC - 10/24 09:44:27
               Impeachment IS a political process - raskolnikov MU - 10/24 10:07:48
                    Never intended to be political. Do you agree?(nm) - tman MU - 10/24 10:12:54
                         No, it was designed to be political - not partican, but - raskolnikov MU - 10/24 10:25:19
                         I think it was always intended to be political - Mormad MU - 10/24 10:14:51
                              Read the Federalist papers and let me know what you think(nm) - tman MU - 10/24 10:17:20
                                   Don't confuse political with partisan(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/24 10:25:47
                                   I've read some of them, and as I stated earlier - Mormad MU - 10/24 10:20:45
               The stunt yesterday was dumb. I mean that was a Gaetz - Mormad MU - 10/24 09:49:09
                    Half the stormers were allowed to be present - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/24 10:02:44
                    Scalise, #2 in the House, spoke at the same podium - Ace AU - 10/24 09:50:36
                         Jordan, I'm not surprised. He's a WH water carrier. - Mormad MU - 10/24 09:51:28
                              RE: Jordan, I'm not surprised. He's a WH water carrier. - Ace AU - 10/24 10:02:01
          lol (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/24 09:43:37
     RE: Judge Nap only serves to feed the anti-Trump frenzy. - None**** MU - 10/24 09:36:38
          You have him confused with Judge Jeanine...fox's other - tigerdb MU - 10/24 09:41:16
               RE: You have him confused with Judge Jeanine. No I don't. - None**** MU - 10/24 09:43:10
                    Why the fvck are you lying? He was a NJ superior court - tigerdb MU - 10/24 09:46:46
                         lying or misinformed - mgtiger MU - 10/24 10:06:37
                              willfully ignorant (nm) - pickle MU - 10/24 10:14:14
                                   you're being too generous, in this case. (nm) - tigerdb MU - 10/24 10:23:12
                                   or willfully misinformed - mgtiger MU - 10/24 10:15:43
                              Yes, - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/24 10:09:44
                              No - he's a liar. - tigerdb MU - 10/24 10:08:47
                                   agreed - mgtiger MU - 10/24 10:13:37
          And you are?? - Ace AU - 10/24 09:40:23
          What did he say that IYO is incorrect?(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 10/24 09:38:58
          you would stand to learn a lot from him - pickle MU - 10/24 09:38:38
     Time for billy barr to meet with murdoch again - tigerdb MU - 10/24 09:36:29
     Has anyone said it's a conspiracy? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/24 09:34:40
          The conspiracy that Republicans are being shut out of the - MrBlueSky MU - 10/24 09:35:06
               lol yep another BlueSky moment - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/24 09:45:00
               The issue isn't one of conspriacy - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 10/24 09:36:36
                    If the information is leaked, don't they know it? - Mormad MU - 10/24 09:38:45
                         They know some of what is happening - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 10/24 09:42:42
                              No - they know EVERYTHING that is happening. - tigerdb MU - 10/24 09:58:25
                                   But they are forbidden from speaking of what goes on - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 10/24 10:04:29
                                        so, the same thing that happened during the benghazie/ - tigerdb MU - 10/24 10:06:27
                                             were those an impeachment inquiry? - Sal MU - 10/24 10:10:04
                                                  Did Bengazhi actuallyninvolve classified information(nm) - tman MU - 10/24 10:14:55
     So you don't care that it looks bad and might be - tcat KC - 10/24 09:33:01
          13 of the Republicans who participated in the little "raid" - MrBlueSky MU - 10/24 09:34:03
               I think you mean stunt, but it should be public - tcat KC - 10/24 09:41:27
                    Why would the investigative stage of an inquiry be public? (nm) - Mo Texan MU - 10/24 09:47:15
                         Because we were told this is a political action not criminal - tcat KC - 10/24 09:51:20
                              Investigative actions are not public regardless - Mo Texan MU - 10/24 11:04:33
                              TIL the investigations in prior impeachments were - MrBlueSky MU - 10/24 09:53:52
                                   But the non public parts of prior impeachments were - tcat KC - 10/24 10:00:28
                              Both previous impeachment efforts had a private component - Mormad MU - 10/24 09:52:24
                                   But didn't they make that public info when made the rules - tcat KC - 10/24 09:57:33
                                        Before the vote, once they've gathered whatever evidence - Mormad MU - 10/24 09:59:45
     But but but they don't allow ANY republicans in the room!!! - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/24 09:30:28
          It does, but you don't care about that. ORANGE MAN BAD (nm) - tcat KC - 10/24 09:33:52




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard