Welcome Guest

Think you better check your facts

Posted on: August 27, 2017 at 11:13:25 CT
ScottsdaleTiger MU
Posts:
12758
Member For:
26.29 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
If I recall correctly,

1. Sheriff Joe was found guilty of not obeying a Federal District Court Judge's order to stop the Sheriff's Department conducting immigration "drag net" patrols.

2. Sheriff Joe did not contest that the patrols were not stopped.

3. Sheriff Joe argued that the order was not a valid order because patrols were not illegal and therefore he had no duty to abide by it.

4. Sheriff Joe was charged with misdemeanor criminal contempt.

5. Sheriff Joe was found guilty of misdemeanor criminal contempt.

So, Sheriff Joe did admit to not stopping the patrols, but he did not admit to committing a crime. He did not admit that he was guilty.

Edited by ScottsdaleTiger at 11:14:45 on 08/27/17
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Grow up: It's just politics - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 8/27 10:32:03
          Scotts, you are arguing with a guy who gets facts from CNN - johncoffey MU - 8/27 12:24:14
     Dems want him hung for violating court order - mu7176grad MU - 8/27 10:06:25
          It's because progressive's like to rule by judicial order. - RHAYWORTH MU - 8/27 11:04:19
          Joe would have won in review court somewhere.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 8/27 10:55:34
          He admitted guilt - Silas MU - 8/27 10:18:51
               Think you better check your facts - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 8/27 11:13:25
                    To accept a pardon, you must admit guilt - Silas MU - 8/27 11:28:56
                         Reviewed Constitution, Fed Pardon Rules and Fed Application - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 8/27 12:20:37
                              Same here ... nothing - Sal KC - 8/27 13:52:14
                         Really? Do you have a link? - Sal KC - 8/27 11:38:43
                    Sounds like a judge pushing his own - Sal KC - 8/27 11:19:14
               The outrage of the pardon is nothing but - Sal KC - 8/27 10:39:33
               Trump has absolute pardon rights--see Clinton pardon of Rich - mu7176grad MU - 8/27 10:33:59
                    A court order premises on The Bill of Rights - Silas MU - 8/27 10:59:33
                         I was held in contempt by Fed Judge in SC - mu7176grad MU - 8/27 11:04:44
                              Sounds like the same thing - Silas MU - 8/27 11:12:14
          They want to jail an 85 year old man for contempt... - Salty Dog MU - 8/27 10:11:28
     Please tell us which one he violated with what action... - Salty Dog MU - 8/27 10:02:59
          4th Amendment to the US Constitution - MrTruman2U MU - 8/27 10:06:50
               What specific incidents are you referring to? - Sal KC - 8/27 10:32:26
               So holding a foreign citizen suspected of a crime... - Salty Dog MU - 8/27 10:10:26
                    Holding a U.S. Citizen without probable cause does nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 8/27 10:36:04
                         What specific indent are you referring to? (nm) - Sal KC - 8/27 10:40:32
                              Here's a couple. Google turned up a lot more - SparkyStalcup MU - 8/27 10:58:44
                                   Those are pretty poor examples - Sal KC - 8/27 11:07:13
                                        They can't arrest someone without probable cause, - SparkyStalcup MU - 8/27 12:45:24
                                             The contact was legal - Sal KC - 8/27 13:55:03
     He violated an order to stop enforcing the law.(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 8/27 10:00:31
          A politically motivated order from a judge in Obama's... - Salty Dog MU - 8/27 10:05:14
          ^^^ this ^^^ (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 8/27 10:02:09




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard