Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

The WARTIME removals are non-justiciable

Posted on: March 18, 2025 at 15:54:01 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
145058
Member For:
20.87 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
From your own link you failed to read/comprehend:

“A war power of the President not subject to judicial review is not transmuted into a judicially reviewable action because the President chooses to have that power exercised within narrower limits than Congress authorized.”
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Roberts is going to let the nonsense continue - Bosalphus KC - 3/18 11:48:24
     here's the actual order - for the lazy - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 15:10:34
     yes, here's detail about the current precedent - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 15:09:12
     Roberts should be impeached. He's the most feckless justice. - Logan STL - 3/18 14:40:33
     Israel should impeach him (nm) - Columbian Gold MU - 3/18 13:07:56
          seems like an odd solution - Bosalphus KC - 3/18 13:10:29
     Why do you hate America?(nm) - Danny Whizzbang USA - 3/18 12:20:46
     Trump just needs to state that the district court - NPDTiger MU - 3/18 12:10:56
          That would be a wonderful idea - meatiger MU - 3/18 12:13:00
               Does everyone have Article II, Section I authority? The - BH O'bonga MU - 3/18 14:47:50
               Easy solution - BigDave MU - 3/18 13:08:48
                    So why would this case ever go to this court? - meatiger MU - 3/18 13:20:22
                         on your part, yes - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 13:21:52
                              so the Supreme Court should just take all cases first? - meatiger MU - 3/18 13:28:12
                                   First of all - BigDave MU - 3/18 13:35:25
                                        RE: First of all - meatiger MU - 3/18 13:39:07
                                             You're not reading what I'm saying - BigDave MU - 3/18 15:17:27
                                   RE: so the Supreme Court should just take all cases first? - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 13:32:20
                    agreed, it isn't hard - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 13:13:58
                    Bingo(nm) - NPDTiger MU - 3/18 13:12:01
               Ignore the TRO's, the case on the merits will - NPDTiger MU - 3/18 12:17:54
                    and meanwhile those animals remain in the country as a - tigertix MU - 3/18 12:20:36
                         If they broke laws - meatiger MU - 3/18 12:23:29
                              No it's not that simple - NPDTiger MU - 3/18 12:26:30
                                   It is if it violates a law that Congress passed. - Rabbit Test MU - 3/18 12:36:42
                                        it doesn't violate the law - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:45:56
                                             Apparently it does - Rabbit Test MU - 3/18 12:49:07
                                                  lol another one(nm) - NPDTiger MU - 3/18 13:02:10
                                                  There's no other reason why a judge - Bosalphus KC - 3/18 12:50:11
                                                       judges are perfect and only act legally - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:51:06
                                                  incorrect - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:49:45
                                   RE: No it's not that simple - sks MU - 3/18 12:34:13
                                        under this reasoning any federal circuit judge - NPDTiger MU - 3/18 13:04:19
                                             RE: under this reasoning any federal circuit judge - sks MU - 3/18 14:18:45
                                                  No this judge is saying he has equitable - NPDTiger MU - 3/18 14:44:17
                                        and this clearly isn't - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:46:29
     RE: Roberts is going to let the nonsense continue - sks MU - 3/18 12:05:53
          This is LTP stuff(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 3/18 14:59:00
          ignoring illegal rulings by lower judges is a problem? - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:36:05
               RE: ignoring illegal rulings by lower judges is a problem? - sks MU - 3/18 13:13:43
                    You could not be more wrong - BigDave MU - 3/18 13:18:15
               How can a ruling be illegal? (nm) - haeffb MU - 3/18 13:02:42
                    Let me give you an example - BigDave MU - 3/18 13:15:08
                         I suppose - haeffb MU - 3/18 13:42:40
                              Illegal, improper, whatever you want to call it - BigDave MU - 3/18 15:26:56
                                   That’s what I’m asking - haeffb MU - 3/18 15:32:09
                                        or in plain English - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 15:53:22
                              so you're making up your own legal language - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 14:54:13
                    are you kidding? - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 13:04:30
                         I’d consider it incorrectly decided - haeffb MU - 3/18 13:07:29
                              lmfao (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 3/18 14:38:42
                              no that doesn't make it legal - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 13:19:07
                                   Is Dobbs a legal ruling? - haeffb MU - 3/18 14:01:06
                                        according to RBG - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 14:44:51
                                             Any ruling overturned is illegal. - haeffb MU - 3/18 15:26:59
                                                  in your case, it's hopeless - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 15:53:46
                                                       Preach on, brother (nm) - haeffb MU - 3/18 15:58:11
          Trump didn't set this precedent (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 3/18 12:33:30
          I think you are getting Trump confused with Dementia Joe - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/18 12:10:53
               RE: I think you are getting Trump confused with Dementia Joe - sks MU - 3/18 12:22:43
                    Nobody's going to pretend he wasn't here and pretend - Wildcat KSU - 3/18 15:04:40
                    oh now you're above it all - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:36:39
     Roberts is correct. Impeachment is not for political - Spanky KU - 3/18 12:02:14
          Of course it is - Bosalphus KC - 3/18 12:33:49
               that's a good point - just as appointment is - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:48:02
          yeah Trumpy is overusing the bully pulpit a bit - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:05:34
               The plaintiffs have no standing which is a basic requirement - tigertix MU - 3/18 12:13:04
                    Except by law they do have legal standing.... - Rabbit Test MU - 3/18 12:38:25
                         except they don't - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:47:11
                              What is "standing"? And why do they not meet that - Spanky KU - 3/18 13:12:24
                                   Russians don't have standing in Ukrainian courts either - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 13:18:09
                                        Nice dodge... We are talking about US law and standing - Spanky KU - 3/18 13:50:24
                                             not a dodge at all - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 14:41:13
                                                  Why do you fear answering the straightforward questions? - Spanky KU - 3/18 14:55:01
                                                       I don't - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 14:58:30
                                                            You are failing here, young man. The topic is "standing" - Spanky KU - 3/18 15:11:35
                                                                 read it and weep - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 15:12:53
                                                                      Educate yourself. Please - Spanky KU - 3/18 15:16:28
                                                                           follow your own advice - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 15:17:22
                                                                                What was the decision in Ludecke v. Watkins? - Spanky KU - 3/18 15:23:35
                                                                                     that removals are non-justiciable - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 15:50:53
                                                                                          The WARTIME removals are non-justiciable - Spanky KU - 3/18 15:54:01
                              Apparently they do - Rabbit Test MU - 3/18 12:50:32
                                   incorrect - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:51:44
                    Why don't they have standing? - Spanky KU - 3/18 12:16:16
                         Because they are a terrorist group and POTUS is exercising - tigertix MU - 3/18 12:23:18
                              That doesn't mean they don't have standing(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/18 12:30:33
                                   actually it could - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:33:59
                                        That just means Trump could prevail in that litigation. - Spanky KU - 3/18 12:36:32
                                             Here - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 14:51:50
                                                  That is dumb. Ludecke v. Watkins inapplicable - Spanky KU - 3/18 15:15:09
                                                       incorrect - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 15:16:32
                                                            The case you cite was about a declared war and nothing - Spanky KU - 3/18 15:41:16
                                             disagree - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:45:05
                                                  That doesn't mean they don't have standing to challenge(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/18 12:53:00
                                                       disagree - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 12:57:08
                                                            They may be wrong and fail, but they have standing - Spanky KU - 3/18 13:07:16
                                                                 what concrete and particularized - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 13:12:46
                                                                      Deportation (nm) - Spanky KU - 3/18 13:53:38
                                                                           not if they are invading - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 14:41:47
                                                                                JFC.... - Spanky KU - 3/18 15:27:17
                                                                                     don't project - FootballRefugee MU - 3/18 15:48:17
                                                                                          Not projecting - Spanky KU - 3/18 18:09:57
     Just heard that, get ready for him and ACB to rule agianst - tigertix MU - 3/18 11:58:54




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard