Welcome Guest

Huh? I follow/explain actual law - and back it up.

Posted on: September 26, 2022 at 15:25:16 CT

Lovely Rita UW

Posts:

3828

Member For:

12.42 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

You wanted to know how the Feds were involved - I explained. Sorry if the law and facts don’t work for you.

Facts and law.

It beats making crap up or pretending to be educated on a subject you know nothing about.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

How is this even a federal issue? - Sal CMSU - 9/26 10:34:01

Uh, the article cites the Federal statute. - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 12:52:38

I'm aware of what the article cites (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/26 14:52:58

that doesn’t answer the question (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/26 13:15:32

Well, when you violate a Federal law, the Feds - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 13:27:10

You still aren't answering the question (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/26 14:53:33

See my responses below. The Feds can and did pass - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:06:10

“commerce” is not a legal term of art - pickle MU

- 9/26 15:22:33

Yeah, it is. Millions of words have been written by the - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:31:54

it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/26 15:34:15

Get a law degree. Or read a book. We’ll talk. - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:41:46

no, we won’t (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/26 16:14:35

another deflection (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/26 15:10:15

Rita just don't know yet - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 9/26 15:11:29

the question is a philosophical one - pickle MU

- 9/26 13:35:25

Well, I’m a lawyer, so yes. The Feds can regulate conduct if - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 13:48:26

that has nothing to do with the commerce clause - pickle MU

- 9/26 14:09:20

Well, you see, it’s not really ‘my argument.’ It’s the - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 14:17:25

oh, appeal to authority - pickle MU

- 9/26 15:07:07

Huh? I follow/explain actual law - and back it up. - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:25:16

i never asked how the feds were involved - pickle MU

- 9/26 15:35:12

Cool. Write a brief. Get them to adopt your well - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:38:36

why? (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/26 16:15:09

the way you and the courts read it, the commerce clause is - ashtray UF - 9/26 15:01:46

Yeah, well take it up with the Supreme Court. It’s pretty - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:16:06

that isn't their job - ashtray UF - 9/26 15:58:08

it isn’t but that’s more laziness - pickle MU

- 9/26 15:20:48

Laziness? Should write a brief for you? The Commerce Clause - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:27:39

you've learned lies and lived them all your life, arrogantly - 90Tiger STL - 9/26 18:50:34

sal doesn't read anything - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 9/26 13:31:16

I read it - Sal CMSU - 9/26 14:54:03

Nope, but apparently they have an abundant amount - Outsider MU - 9/26 11:50:28

that's democracy for ya (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 11:54:00

Yep, and it’s why the Dems want open borders… - Outsider MU - 9/26 12:02:11

then let's make sure we keep voting and participating in - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:16:05

Dems in Congress made it a federal issue in 1994 - Spanky KU - 9/26 11:10:40

how'd DiFi vote on it? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 11:20:42

she voted “Yea” (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/26 12:22:53

She is a Dem last time I checked. Did my post - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:23:31

thanks. dont know why googlemeister had trouble with that(nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 12:57:26

because he’s a troll (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/26 13:45:44

oh, right - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 14:03:47

Why do you have trouble making a point?(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:11:38

irrelevant to this thread (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 13:36:28

Nope.. it is 100% relevant to your post - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:39:20

you're confused (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 13:41:13

Nope... You are simply wrong - Spanky KU - 9/26 14:33:59

Do you think that law legalized abortion? - Spanky KU - 9/26 11:30:54

no. why? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 11:33:11

What's your attempted point then?(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/26 11:37:03

that you supported the Dems in Congress (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 11:39:57

Do you think that law legalized abortion? - Spanky KU - 9/26 12:07:43

facilitates it, which you obviously voted for (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:15:35

nope... try again - Spanky KU - 9/26 12:21:04

good argument, stunad (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:25:45

Better than yours, dumb@$$(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/26 12:27:23

nu uh (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:34:00

Make an actual argument for once, dumb@$$ - Spanky KU - 9/26 12:42:09

an argument like this? - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:59:27

That is the response you earned by failing to - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:10:31

I made an argument. That was the best you could come up with - ashtray UF - 9/26 13:33:50

No.. you vomited an unsupported statement...not an argument(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:37:36

should have been easy to counter, but since you couldn't - ashtray UF - 9/26 13:40:54

Nothing to counter. At least TRY to make an argument - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:42:02

your continuation of failure is your signal of defeat - ashtray UF - 9/26 13:46:35

Dumb@$$ - Spanky KU - 9/26 14:37:31

you already conceded. no need to - ashtray UF - 9/26 15:00:16

Dance away without posting an argument - Spanky KU - 9/26 15:27:01

yes, that's what you're trying to do - ashtray UF - 9/26 15:57:22

I know you are but what am I? - Spanky KU - 9/26 16:18:49

Jane's Revenge is on their team - tcat KC - 9/26 11:01:34

How is this even a federal issue?: The Xiden* regime is at - BH O'bonga MU - 9/26 10:47:00

This was a warning to those considering not - hokie VT - 9/26 10:39:32