Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Well, I’m a lawyer, so yes. The Feds can regulate conduct if

Posted on: September 26, 2022 at 13:48:26 CT
Lovely Rita UW
Posts:
3828
Member For:
12.42 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
there is a rational basis to conclude that it substantially affects interstate commerce. Being a con law expert I’m sure you are familiar with the Commerce Clause. (That would be in Article I, Section 8 of that Constitution you spoke of).

I’m not sure about philosophy - but that is the law.

Edited by Lovely Rita at 14:07:12 on 09/26/22
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

How is this even a federal issue? - Sal CMSU - 9/26 10:34:01
     Uh, the article cites the Federal statute. - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 12:52:38
          I'm aware of what the article cites (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/26 14:52:58
          that doesn’t answer the question (nm) - pickle MU - 9/26 13:15:32
               Well, when you violate a Federal law, the Feds - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 13:27:10
                    You still aren't answering the question (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/26 14:53:33
                         See my responses below. The Feds can and did pass - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:06:10
                              “commerce” is not a legal term of art - pickle MU - 9/26 15:22:33
                                   Yeah, it is. Millions of words have been written by the - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:31:54
                                        it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 9/26 15:34:15
                                             Get a law degree. Or read a book. We’ll talk. - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:41:46
                                                  no, we won’t (nm) - pickle MU - 9/26 16:14:35
                              another deflection (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/26 15:10:15
                                   Rita just don't know yet - JayHoaxH8r MU - 9/26 15:11:29
                    the question is a philosophical one - pickle MU - 9/26 13:35:25
                         Well, I’m a lawyer, so yes. The Feds can regulate conduct if - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 13:48:26
                              that has nothing to do with the commerce clause - pickle MU - 9/26 14:09:20
                                   Well, you see, it’s not really ‘my argument.’ It’s the - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 14:17:25
                                        oh, appeal to authority - pickle MU - 9/26 15:07:07
                                             Huh? I follow/explain actual law - and back it up. - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:25:16
                                                  i never asked how the feds were involved - pickle MU - 9/26 15:35:12
                                                       Cool. Write a brief. Get them to adopt your well - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:38:36
                                                            why? (nm) - pickle MU - 9/26 16:15:09
                                        the way you and the courts read it, the commerce clause is - ashtray UF - 9/26 15:01:46
                                             Yeah, well take it up with the Supreme Court. It’s pretty - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:16:06
                                                  that isn't their job - ashtray UF - 9/26 15:58:08
                                                  it isn’t but that’s more laziness - pickle MU - 9/26 15:20:48
                                                       Laziness? Should write a brief for you? The Commerce Clause - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:27:39
                                                            you've learned lies and lived them all your life, arrogantly - 90Tiger STL - 9/26 18:50:34
                    sal doesn't read anything - JayHoaxH8r MU - 9/26 13:31:16
                         I read it - Sal CMSU - 9/26 14:54:03
     Nope, but apparently they have an abundant amount - Outsider MU - 9/26 11:50:28
          that's democracy for ya (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 11:54:00
               Yep, and it’s why the Dems want open borders… - Outsider MU - 9/26 12:02:11
                    then let's make sure we keep voting and participating in - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:16:05
     Dems in Congress made it a federal issue in 1994 - Spanky KU - 9/26 11:10:40
          how'd DiFi vote on it? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 11:20:42
               she voted “Yea” (nm) - pickle MU - 9/26 12:22:53
                    She is a Dem last time I checked. Did my post - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:23:31
                    thanks. dont know why googlemeister had trouble with that(nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 12:57:26
                         because he’s a troll (nm) - pickle MU - 9/26 13:45:44
                              oh, right - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 14:03:47
                         Why do you have trouble making a point?(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:11:38
                              irrelevant to this thread (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 13:36:28
                                   Nope.. it is 100% relevant to your post - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:39:20
                                        you're confused (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 13:41:13
                                             Nope... You are simply wrong - Spanky KU - 9/26 14:33:59
               Do you think that law legalized abortion? - Spanky KU - 9/26 11:30:54
                    no. why? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 11:33:11
                         What's your attempted point then?(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/26 11:37:03
                              that you supported the Dems in Congress (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 11:39:57
                                   Do you think that law legalized abortion? - Spanky KU - 9/26 12:07:43
                                        facilitates it, which you obviously voted for (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:15:35
                                             nope... try again - Spanky KU - 9/26 12:21:04
                                                  good argument, stunad (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:25:45
                                                       Better than yours, dumb@$$(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/26 12:27:23
                                                            nu uh (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:34:00
                                                                 Make an actual argument for once, dumb@$$ - Spanky KU - 9/26 12:42:09
                                                                      an argument like this? - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:59:27
                                                                           That is the response you earned by failing to - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:10:31
                                                                                I made an argument. That was the best you could come up with - ashtray UF - 9/26 13:33:50
                                                                                     No.. you vomited an unsupported statement...not an argument(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:37:36
                                                                                          should have been easy to counter, but since you couldn't - ashtray UF - 9/26 13:40:54
                                                                                               Nothing to counter. At least TRY to make an argument - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:42:02
                                                                                                    your continuation of failure is your signal of defeat - ashtray UF - 9/26 13:46:35
                                                                                                         Dumb@$$ - Spanky KU - 9/26 14:37:31
                                                                                                              you already conceded. no need to - ashtray UF - 9/26 15:00:16
                                                                                                                   Dance away without posting an argument - Spanky KU - 9/26 15:27:01
                                                                                                                        yes, that's what you're trying to do - ashtray UF - 9/26 15:57:22
                                                                                                                             I know you are but what am I? - Spanky KU - 9/26 16:18:49
     Jane's Revenge is on their team - tcat KC - 9/26 11:01:34
     How is this even a federal issue?: The Xiden* regime is at - BH O'bonga MU - 9/26 10:47:00
     This was a warning to those considering not - hokie VT - 9/26 10:39:32




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard