Welcome Guest

“commerce” is not a legal term of art

Posted on: September 26, 2022 at 15:22:33 CT

pickle MU

Posts:

267340

Member For:

26.32 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

It has a plain meaning as does the commerce clause. “legal context” is not necessary to understand the plain meaning of the word and clause. further the ratification debates are there for all to read

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

How is this even a federal issue? - Sal CMSU - 9/26 10:34:01

Uh, the article cites the Federal statute. - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 12:52:38

I'm aware of what the article cites (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/26 14:52:58

that doesn’t answer the question (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/26 13:15:32

Well, when you violate a Federal law, the Feds - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 13:27:10

You still aren't answering the question (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/26 14:53:33

See my responses below. The Feds can and did pass - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:06:10

“commerce” is not a legal term of art - pickle MU

- 9/26 15:22:33

Yeah, it is. Millions of words have been written by the - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:31:54

it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/26 15:34:15

Get a law degree. Or read a book. We’ll talk. - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:41:46

no, we won’t (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/26 16:14:35

another deflection (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/26 15:10:15

Rita just don't know yet - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 9/26 15:11:29

the question is a philosophical one - pickle MU

- 9/26 13:35:25

Well, I’m a lawyer, so yes. The Feds can regulate conduct if - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 13:48:26

that has nothing to do with the commerce clause - pickle MU

- 9/26 14:09:20

Well, you see, it’s not really ‘my argument.’ It’s the - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 14:17:25

oh, appeal to authority - pickle MU

- 9/26 15:07:07

Huh? I follow/explain actual law - and back it up. - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:25:16

i never asked how the feds were involved - pickle MU

- 9/26 15:35:12

Cool. Write a brief. Get them to adopt your well - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:38:36

why? (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/26 16:15:09

the way you and the courts read it, the commerce clause is - ashtray UF - 9/26 15:01:46

Yeah, well take it up with the Supreme Court. It’s pretty - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:16:06

that isn't their job - ashtray UF - 9/26 15:58:08

it isn’t but that’s more laziness - pickle MU

- 9/26 15:20:48

Laziness? Should write a brief for you? The Commerce Clause - Lovely Rita STL - 9/26 15:27:39

you've learned lies and lived them all your life, arrogantly - 90Tiger STL - 9/26 18:50:34

sal doesn't read anything - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 9/26 13:31:16

I read it - Sal CMSU - 9/26 14:54:03

Nope, but apparently they have an abundant amount - Outsider MU - 9/26 11:50:28

that's democracy for ya (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 11:54:00

Yep, and it’s why the Dems want open borders… - Outsider MU - 9/26 12:02:11

then let's make sure we keep voting and participating in - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:16:05

Dems in Congress made it a federal issue in 1994 - Spanky KU - 9/26 11:10:40

how'd DiFi vote on it? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 11:20:42

she voted “Yea” (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/26 12:22:53

She is a Dem last time I checked. Did my post - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:23:31

thanks. dont know why googlemeister had trouble with that(nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 12:57:26

because he’s a troll (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/26 13:45:44

oh, right - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 14:03:47

Why do you have trouble making a point?(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:11:38

irrelevant to this thread (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 13:36:28

Nope.. it is 100% relevant to your post - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:39:20

you're confused (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 13:41:13

Nope... You are simply wrong - Spanky KU - 9/26 14:33:59

Do you think that law legalized abortion? - Spanky KU - 9/26 11:30:54

no. why? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/26 11:33:11

What's your attempted point then?(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/26 11:37:03

that you supported the Dems in Congress (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 11:39:57

Do you think that law legalized abortion? - Spanky KU - 9/26 12:07:43

facilitates it, which you obviously voted for (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:15:35

nope... try again - Spanky KU - 9/26 12:21:04

good argument, stunad (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:25:45

Better than yours, dumb@$$(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/26 12:27:23

nu uh (nm) - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:34:00

Make an actual argument for once, dumb@$$ - Spanky KU - 9/26 12:42:09

an argument like this? - ashtray UF - 9/26 12:59:27

That is the response you earned by failing to - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:10:31

I made an argument. That was the best you could come up with - ashtray UF - 9/26 13:33:50

No.. you vomited an unsupported statement...not an argument(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:37:36

should have been easy to counter, but since you couldn't - ashtray UF - 9/26 13:40:54

Nothing to counter. At least TRY to make an argument - Spanky KU - 9/26 13:42:02

your continuation of failure is your signal of defeat - ashtray UF - 9/26 13:46:35

Dumb@$$ - Spanky KU - 9/26 14:37:31

you already conceded. no need to - ashtray UF - 9/26 15:00:16

Dance away without posting an argument - Spanky KU - 9/26 15:27:01

yes, that's what you're trying to do - ashtray UF - 9/26 15:57:22

I know you are but what am I? - Spanky KU - 9/26 16:18:49

Jane's Revenge is on their team - tcat KC - 9/26 11:01:34

How is this even a federal issue?: The Xiden* regime is at - BH O'bonga MU - 9/26 10:47:00

This was a warning to those considering not - hokie VT - 9/26 10:39:32