Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

"Incentive" NIL Deals Allowable

Posted on: July 19, 2022 at 09:24:11 CT
ScottsdaleTiger MU
Posts:
12769
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
NIL deals are between the player (or perhaps his legal guardian) and a third party sponsor. The school is not a party.

The value of a player's name, image and likeness would all seem to go up the more successful he is individually and his team is. Wouldn't it be to the sponsor's advantage to structure the deal to create incentives for the kid to succeed. I.e. the more success, the more money.

The deal is between the kid (and perhaps his parents) and the third party sponsor. The right to contract is quite broad. I'm not aware of anything that would preclude the kid, his parents and the sponsor building incentives into the NIL contract.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

"Incentive" NIL Deals Allowable - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 7/19 09:24:11
     Perhaps, but that still seems to be a bit of an overstatemen - JeffB MU - 7/19 13:32:17
     Yes sir. I'm glad for them and their parents. No calling - Spartus MWSC - 7/19 12:59:18
     Incentivized pay is absolutely defensible but, generally, - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 7/19 12:47:59
     That has been my contention from the beginning of this, - MU-TULSA MU - 7/19 12:27:37
          Well, it was illegal in the state of Missouri until June to - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 7/19 13:04:59
               Which portion of the bill are you characterizing as "can use - zounami MU - 7/20 00:56:41
                    Also, just because a state passes a law saying something is - zounami MU - 7/20 00:59:50
     RE: "Incentive" NIL Deals Allowable - wtk UT - 7/19 12:27:01
     Ahoy Captain - alwaysright MU - 7/19 11:28:30
     There are no restrictions. That was the point of - Rabbit Test MU - 7/19 10:36:34
          Which "court case" are you citing, specifically? (nm) - zounami MU - 7/20 00:53:36
     Correct. - TigerMook MU - 7/19 10:35:14
     What you're suggesting is pay for play, not NIL... - zounami MU - 7/19 09:32:36
          RE: What you're suggesting is pay for play, not NIL... - wtk UT - 7/19 12:28:42
               Nope. They're entirely different things. (nm) - zounami MU - 7/20 00:53:12
          A union and 50% revenue share is the best solution - Genco98 MU - 7/19 11:42:58
               Why would you need a union to do that, that would - MU-TULSA MU - 7/19 15:05:29
                    One seems simpler than 120 - Genco98 MU - 7/19 17:34:27
               That solution doesn't prevent individual NIL deals. - Rabbit Test MU - 7/19 12:36:49
                    The Supreme Court never ruled on NIL. It issued a very - zounami MU - 7/20 00:52:35
                    I understand but it would create uniformity and consistency - Genco98 MU - 7/19 13:02:56
          Not necessarily. TomBrady makes more money doing - alwaysright MU - 7/19 11:26:31




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard