Welcome Guest

no

Posted on: June 24, 2022 at 11:15:47 CT

XRob MU

Posts:

26337

Member For:

21.79 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

title IX dictates equal opportunities, i.e. the same number of female athletes as male athletes, same financial aid etc. Percentage of revenue generated by a sport is irrelevant because female sports don't make money.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

NFL lite is coming - Genco98 MU - 6/24 07:04:36

as a citizen and taxpayer, I can't wait to get my share - deputyfife MU - 6/24 14:58:09

Running the numbers your total comes to $5.63 so - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 6/24 17:19:23

Your cut is reinvested back into the AD. (nm) - zounami MU - 6/24 15:19:09

He's right about one thing... TV revenues will be shared - zounami MU - 6/24 09:36:53

Man, being an owner is so complicated.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 6/24 13:15:11

Probably right..except when was the last time - GA Tiger MU - 6/24 09:56:49

Title IX - o'lineydisciple MU - 6/24 09:51:40

NIL, in theory, shouldn't have Title IX issues because it's - zounami MU - 6/24 10:07:31

You got it. NIL just makes the ncaa cheating legal now - GA Tiger MU - 6/25 08:04:16

legal, and thus far more rampant (nm) - zounami MU - 6/25 10:21:28

private entities fund NIL, not the schools. - TigerMook MU - 6/24 10:03:40

TV money would be subject to title IX.(nm) - SuperTone MU

- 6/24 10:46:52

True, but it wouldn't violate Title IX since distributions - zounami MU - 6/24 10:52:03

title IX is about how schools have to spend money - SuperTone MU

- 6/24 13:34:59

Expenditures on men's & women's sports are not equal. (nm) - zounami MU - 6/24 14:52:50

no - XRob MU

- 6/24 11:15:47

but in terms of TV-revenue specifically, if distributions - zounami MU - 6/24 11:21:11

I think Herbstreit is talking about the TV revenues - Genco98 MU - 6/24 10:40:50

it would have to. any money going to male players - SuperTone MU

- 6/24 10:47:33

That seems wrong on multiple levels. First of all, AD's - zounami MU - 6/24 10:55:54

I wonder if they formed separate corporations if they - Genco98 MU - 6/24 11:31:13

then you'd have private companies paying players.... - SuperTone MU

- 6/24 13:36:14

Great point - Genco98 MU - 6/24 19:37:52

Good question and another one the NIL idiots never - GA Tiger MU - 6/24 09:58:27

not just P5 - MizzouAstro MU

- 6/24 07:51:35

I think the number is 64 schools across 4 conferences - jlbomega MU - 6/24 09:20:46

32 much more likely(nm) - MizzouAstro MU

- 6/24 10:39:43

So assuming 6 come from the ACC+ND, which 16 schools - zounami MU - 6/24 10:50:49

I'm not so sure - if you are sharing revenues and trying - Genco98 MU - 6/24 09:58:04

Correct, you wouldn't want garbage brands in your conference - zounami MU - 6/24 10:09:47

So, for example, who does the Pac-12 add to get to 16? (nm) - zounami MU - 6/24 09:30:08

UNLV is first, then Boise St, Hawaii & San Diego State - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 6/24 20:41:34

lol... c'mon, you know damn well the PAC presidents would - zounami MU - 6/25 00:33:48

The discussion is "possible", not "likely" - nm - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 6/25 02:29:37

The PAC's only chance at expansion was a package deal with - zounami MU - 6/25 07:37:45

Agreed (nm) - Fourth and Long MU - 6/24 09:20:18

The Pac-12, Big Ten, and SEC aren't breaking up or - zounami MU - 6/24 09:05:47

Things aren't going very well in the Pac 12 - jlbomega MU - 6/24 09:14:58

True, but the PAC's power-brokers will be fine... - zounami MU - 6/24 09:29:01

Agree completely - Genco98 MU - 6/24 07:58:52

maybe you'll get the guaranteed path to the playoffs you - SwampTiger MU - 6/24 07:50:59