Wrong.
Posted on: July 13, 2021 at 20:50:40 CT
haeffb MU
Posts:
12857
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
Moderator
M.O.B. Votes:
0
“ Finally, the institution also agreed and the panel concludes it committed a Level III violation when representative 1 had multiple impermissible recruiting contacts with a then men's basketball prospective student-athlete and provided a then scholastic men's basketball coach impermissible benefits and entertainment. ”
Detailed as follows;
“ 4. [NCAA Division I Manual Bylaws 13.01.2, 13.1.2.1, 13.1.2.4, 13.1.2.4-(a), 13.1.2.5, 13.1.3.5.1, 13.2.1, 13.2.1.1 and 13.8.1(2012-13 and 2013-14)] (Level III) The institution and NCAA enforcement staff agree that between 2012 and 2014, representative 1 had multiple impermissible recruiting contacts with a then men's basketball prospective student-athlete and provided a then nonscholastic men's basketball coach impermissible benefits and entertainment. Specifically: a. Between approximately 2012 and 2014, representative 1 participated in impermissible recruiting activities involving then men's basketball prospective student-athlete (prospect 1). On or about October 1, 2012, representative 1 accompanied the then associate head men's basketball coach to evaluate prospect 1 during a private workout at prospect 1's high school in Augusta, Georgia. ”