 |
|
Ultimately, I think that's what they want
Posted on: March 1, 2021 at 16:05:44 CT
mizzouSECedes STL
Posts:
35912
Member For:
13.43 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
That's typically how scientists get interested in a problem to begin with. An issue that affects a large scale that may or may not involve or affect themselves personally. Meat correctly points out that the resolve of the scientist or the potential effect a science advancement has on a larger scale problem gets stymied when administrators -- those that have the power to implement the advancement-- don't have a direct benefit of that implementation.
And when I mention administrator, that could mean a department head, a dean, a politician, or someone peer reviewing your research. I've personally had my research rejected from publication in a certain journal because I didn't cite enough of his papers. I didn't need to, but that doesn't matter, the benefit to that that person wasn't there.
Edited by mizzouSECedes at 16:09:42 on 03/01/21
And when I mention administrator, that could mean a department head, a dean, a politician, or someone peer reviewing your research. I've personally had my research rejected from publication in a certain journal because I didn't cite enough of his papers. I didn't need to, but that doesn't matter, the benefit to that that person wasn't there.
Edited by mizzouSECedes at 16:09:42 on 03/01/21
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Ultimately, I think that's what they want - mizzouSECedes STL - 3/1 16:05:44