Welcome Guest

Because, outside of egghead fantasy, "negative rights"

Posted on: April 11, 2020 at 14:10:38 CT
jonesin
Posts:
20288
Member For:
25.84 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
don't exist.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Federal Emergency Statutes - *M* KC - 4/11 11:58:00
     Thank you M - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/11 12:31:45
     It isn't about opening up. It was illegal to shut it down(nm) - TigerFan92 MU - 4/11 12:11:31
     interestingly, despite all the rhetorical grumbling - Ace AU - 4/11 12:08:17
          because they were told it would be 2 weeks - ashtray UF - 4/11 12:35:53
               really? - Ace AU - 4/11 12:44:45
                    so public institutions is all you got? - ashtray UF - 4/11 12:46:20
                         "offices" - Ace AU - 4/11 12:56:44
                         Those will all fail and the new commie government will soon - jonesin - 4/11 12:53:10
          incarcerated? yes. killed? no. - blake1771 MU - 4/11 12:14:55
          that's become the common (and 100% wrong) interpretation - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:09:07
               it reduces the Constitution to a set of guidelines - ashtray UF - 4/11 12:38:12
               An original "bench legislator". Fatal to the republic. nm - jonesin - 4/11 12:11:54
     RE: Federal Emergency Statutes - pickle MU - 4/11 12:01:41
          RE: Federal Emergency Statutes - Ace AU - 4/11 12:48:29
          RE: Federal Emergency Statutes - *M* KC - 4/11 12:07:58
               citing examples of the feds violating the constitution as - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:25:08
                    hey, dummy - *M* KC - 4/11 12:44:58
                         "my system"? how about we use "our system", which - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:54:46
                              One small problem. Thats not our system. - *M* KC - 4/11 12:57:06
                                   That is exactly the system - pickle MU - 4/11 13:08:18
                                        hasnt been for at least 216 years. Im real sorry for you - *M* KC - 4/11 13:14:09
                                             so if I don't accept an obvious abuse of power - ashtray UF - 4/11 13:26:20
                                                  astonishing that someone who bills $675/hr would use that - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:35:49
                                             and we’re done here - pickle MU - 4/11 13:23:01
                                             lol, so now you've changed your tune from "cite the - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:16:28
                                   "anyone that matters"? I matter, every citizen matters, the - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:59:24
                                        actually, you dont. - *M* KC - 4/11 13:06:17
                                             In M v M the court stole power for scotus not given to it - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:10:08
                                             lazy (nm) - pickle MU - 4/11 13:09:06
                                             LOL - ashtray UF - 4/11 13:07:53
                                                  I don't think he's arguing that it's the correct way, or - jonesin - 4/11 13:16:10
                                                       BINGO!! Post Of The Day from Jonesin - *M* KC - 4/11 13:49:27
                                                            he doesn't even know what a negative right is - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:04:28
                                                                 Because, outside of egghead fantasy, "negative rights" - jonesin - 4/11 14:10:38
                                                                      ask yourself this simple question: In the constitution, wha - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:23:10
                                                                           I know what they meant. That these rights were granted to - jonesin - 4/11 14:40:03
                                                                      lol, they are the basis for nearly every law you revere and - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:16:56
                                                                           RE: lol, they are the basis for nearly every law you revere and - jonesin - 4/11 14:22:39
                                                                                this is the definition of willful ignorance (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:27:57
                                                                                     I edited it. Read it again if you want. nm - jonesin - 4/11 14:30:04
                                                            RE: BINGO!! Post Of The Day from Jonesin - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:03:52
                                                       we already know that (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/11 13:19:46
                                                       RE: I don't think he's arguing that it's the correct way, or - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:19:21
                                                            Well, looks like he has a firm grip on capitalism. - jonesin - 4/11 13:31:00
                                                                 that wasn't the topic (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:36:14
                    RE: citing examples of the feds violating the constitution as - *M* KC - 4/11 12:33:15
                         so "we the people" means nothing at all to you? - ashtray UF - 4/11 12:42:50
                              he doesn't even know about the Feds absconding with Judicial - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:57:15
                                   Article and Clause, please. Dummy(nm) - *M* KC - 4/11 13:00:03
                                        Article and clause for emergency powers, lazy (nm) - pickle MU - 4/11 13:10:07
                                        what is the most important word in this text? - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:03:02
                                        you 're asking me to point to an article and clause to show - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:01:14
                              RE: so "we the people" means nothing at all to you? - *M* KC - 4/11 12:54:50
                                   they have the ultimate legal force - ashtray UF - 4/11 12:56:27
                                        RE: they have the ultimate legal force - *M* KC - 4/11 12:58:41
                         RE: citing examples of the feds violating the constitution as - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:33:33
               RE: Federal Emergency Statutes - pickle MU - 4/11 12:22:31
                    RE: Federal Emergency Statutes - *M* KC - 4/11 12:34:00
                         lazy - pickle MU - 4/11 12:35:43
                              RE: lazy - *M* KC - 4/11 12:37:18
                                   cite the constitution, *M* - pickle MU - 4/11 12:39:08
                                        RE: cite the constitution, *M* - *M* KC - 4/11 12:43:20
                                             You've clearly had the wrong teachers, there are 1000's of - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:05:43
                                             Then you should point to the article and clause in the US - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:04:16
                                             you’re lazy (nm) - pickle MU - 4/11 12:44:51
                                                  youre a dumb***. * - *M* KC - 4/11 12:45:44
                                                       nope (nm) - pickle MU - 4/11 12:50:51
               **** the law, quit blowing authority at every turn and - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:15:23
                    a couple of thoughts - *M* KC - 4/11 12:31:03
                         and "**** the law" means **** it when it's unconstitutional - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:35:42
                              RE: and "**** the law" means **** it when it's unconstitutional - *M* KC - 4/11 12:38:35
                                   a federal law? The states, via nullification. and it's not - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:22:29
                         well that’s a willfully ignorant argument (nm) - pickle MU - 4/11 12:34:38
                              RE: well that’s a willfully ignorant argument(nm) - *M* KC - 4/11 12:36:11
                         You like the ACA? does it's legal standing make it - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:33:15
                              RE: You like the ACA? does it's legal standing make it - *M* KC - 4/11 12:35:30
                                   it's not, and that's despite SCOTUS saying it is. the - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:36:58
          I feel my rights draining away, Pickled. - jonesin - 4/11 12:07:47
               probably rigorously defend those causing it (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:09:50
                    I don't defend globalist/NWO actors with commie tendencies. - jonesin - 4/11 12:18:19
                         Give me a break about Trump. He signed and supported - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:21:37
                              He has stood up many times in the first term only to be - jonesin - 4/11 12:25:49
                                   He's sold out 99.8% of the time. Be real (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:26:35
                                        If you call being harassed, sued, ignored and detested - jonesin - 4/11 12:31:12
                                             all of those things have occurred, but trump has personally - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:32:44
                                                  Yeah. He's bucked the system and didn't belong to the club. - jonesin - 4/11 12:40:22
                         And thanks for taking up for Pickled. His butt still hurts - jonesin - 4/11 12:20:18
                              You'll die not understanding rights. You should - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:22:13
                                   Rights are given and taken by men. You had to agree with it - jonesin - 4/11 12:27:59
                                        If I'm imprisoned, my right to freedom hasn't been "taken", - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:31:05
                                             Then we agree. nm - jonesin - 4/11 12:37:16
                                                  no, we don't agree at all. (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:00:19
                                                       Yeah, we do. You can say your rights were "infringed upon" - jonesin - 4/11 13:07:53
                                                            No, because my right persists despite infringement. If I - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:12:00
                                                                 I don't need a vocabulary lesson, or one on comprehension. - jonesin - 4/11 13:25:33
                                                                      You clearly need a lesson in negative rights and the languag - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:38:53
                                                                           I'll graciously decline. Negative rights sounds kinda like - jonesin - 4/11 13:49:00
                                                                                Here, I'll do you a favor: - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:54:59
                                                                                     I'm not interested in discussing - jonesin - 4/11 14:21:52
                                                                                          this is the definition of willful ignorance. are you expres - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:29:09
                                                                                               Did you read the addendum? - jonesin - 4/11 14:31:36
                                                                                                    yes (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 15:27:56
                                        no, they are infringed upon by men, not taken. rights - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:30:21
                                             What special - jonesin - 4/11 12:36:48
                                                  You're referring to positive rights, not the negative rights - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:58:25




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard