Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

hasnt been for at least 216 years. Im real sorry for you

Posted on: April 11, 2020 at 13:14:09 CT

*M* KC

Posts:

31707

Member For:

24.14 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

And your little buddy 90, but if you don’t accept Marbury, then why do you pay your taxes on time?

Are you such a little cowardly phony that you are afraid to live in accordance with your deeply held principles. If you were as tough in real life as you pretend to be on here, you’d be willing to violate your parole and take your licks.

I haven’t got the time to waste arguing with morons who don’t accept Marbury v Madison.

Bye.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Federal Emergency Statutes - *M* KC - 4/11 11:58:00

Thank you M - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 4/11 12:31:45

It isn't about opening up. It was illegal to shut it down(nm) - TigerFan92 MU - 4/11 12:11:31

interestingly, despite all the rhetorical grumbling - Ace AU - 4/11 12:08:17

because they were told it would be 2 weeks - ashtray UF - 4/11 12:35:53

really? - Ace AU - 4/11 12:44:45

so public institutions is all you got? - ashtray UF - 4/11 12:46:20

"offices" - Ace AU - 4/11 12:56:44

Those will all fail and the new commie government will soon - jonesin - 4/11 12:53:10

incarcerated? yes. killed? no. - blake1771 MU - 4/11 12:14:55

From the Brennan Center. A non profit formed in honor of - jonesin - 4/11 12:04:01

that's become the common (and 100% wrong) interpretation - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:09:07

it reduces the Constitution to a set of guidelines - ashtray UF - 4/11 12:38:12

An original "bench legislator". Fatal to the republic. nm - jonesin - 4/11 12:11:54

RE: Federal Emergency Statutes - pickle MU

- 4/11 12:01:41

RE: Federal Emergency Statutes - Ace AU - 4/11 12:48:29

RE: Federal Emergency Statutes - *M* KC - 4/11 12:07:58

citing examples of the feds violating the constitution as - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:25:08

hey, dummy - *M* KC - 4/11 12:44:58

"my system"? how about we use "our system", which - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:54:46

One small problem. Thats not our system. - *M* KC - 4/11 12:57:06

That is exactly the system - pickle MU

- 4/11 13:08:18

hasnt been for at least 216 years. Im real sorry for you - *M* KC - 4/11 13:14:09

so if I don't accept an obvious abuse of power - ashtray UF - 4/11 13:26:20

astonishing that someone who bills $675/hr would use that - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:35:49

and we’re done here - pickle MU

- 4/11 13:23:01

lol, so now you've changed your tune from "cite the - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:16:28

"anyone that matters"? I matter, every citizen matters, the - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:59:24

actually, you dont. - *M* KC - 4/11 13:06:17

In M v M the court stole power for scotus not given to it - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:10:08

lazy (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/11 13:09:06

LOL - ashtray UF - 4/11 13:07:53

I don't think he's arguing that it's the correct way, or - jonesin - 4/11 13:16:10

BINGO!! Post Of The Day from Jonesin - *M* KC - 4/11 13:49:27

he doesn't even know what a negative right is - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:04:28

Because, outside of egghead fantasy, "negative rights" - jonesin - 4/11 14:10:38

ask yourself this simple question: In the constitution, wha - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:23:10

I know what they meant. That these rights were granted to - jonesin - 4/11 14:40:03

lol, they are the basis for nearly every law you revere and - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:16:56

RE: lol, they are the basis for nearly every law you revere and - jonesin - 4/11 14:22:39

this is the definition of willful ignorance (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:27:57

I edited it. Read it again if you want. nm - jonesin - 4/11 14:30:04

RE: BINGO!! Post Of The Day from Jonesin - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:03:52

we already know that (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/11 13:19:46

RE: I don't think he's arguing that it's the correct way, or - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:19:21

Well, looks like he has a firm grip on capitalism. - jonesin - 4/11 13:31:00

that wasn't the topic (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:36:14

RE: citing examples of the feds violating the constitution as - *M* KC - 4/11 12:33:15

so "we the people" means nothing at all to you? - ashtray UF - 4/11 12:42:50

he doesn't even know about the Feds absconding with Judicial - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:57:15

Article and Clause, please. Dummy(nm) - *M* KC - 4/11 13:00:03

Article and clause for emergency powers, lazy (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/11 13:10:07

what is the most important word in this text? - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:03:02

you 're asking me to point to an article and clause to show - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:01:14

RE: so "we the people" means nothing at all to you? - *M* KC - 4/11 12:54:50

they have the ultimate legal force - ashtray UF - 4/11 12:56:27

RE: they have the ultimate legal force - *M* KC - 4/11 12:58:41

RE: citing examples of the feds violating the constitution as - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:33:33

RE: Federal Emergency Statutes - pickle MU

- 4/11 12:22:31

RE: Federal Emergency Statutes - *M* KC - 4/11 12:34:00

lazy - pickle MU

- 4/11 12:35:43

RE: lazy - *M* KC - 4/11 12:37:18

cite the constitution, *M* - pickle MU

- 4/11 12:39:08

RE: cite the constitution, *M* - *M* KC - 4/11 12:43:20

You've clearly had the wrong teachers, there are 1000's of - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:05:43

Then you should point to the article and clause in the US - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:04:16

you’re lazy (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/11 12:44:51

youre a dumb***. * - *M* KC - 4/11 12:45:44

nope (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/11 12:50:51

**** the law, quit blowing authority at every turn and - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:15:23

a couple of thoughts - *M* KC - 4/11 12:31:03

and "**** the law" means **** it when it's unconstitutional - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:35:42

RE: and "**** the law" means **** it when it's unconstitutional - *M* KC - 4/11 12:38:35

a federal law? The states, via nullification. and it's not - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:22:29

well that’s a willfully ignorant argument (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/11 12:34:38

RE: well that’s a willfully ignorant argument(nm) - *M* KC - 4/11 12:36:11

You like the ACA? does it's legal standing make it - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:33:15

RE: You like the ACA? does it's legal standing make it - *M* KC - 4/11 12:35:30

it's not, and that's despite SCOTUS saying it is. the - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:36:58

I feel my rights draining away, Pickled. - jonesin - 4/11 12:07:47

probably rigorously defend those causing it (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:09:50

I don't defend globalist/NWO actors with commie tendencies. - jonesin - 4/11 12:18:19

Give me a break about Trump. He signed and supported - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:21:37

He has stood up many times in the first term only to be - jonesin - 4/11 12:25:49

He's sold out 99.8% of the time. Be real (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:26:35

If you call being harassed, sued, ignored and detested - jonesin - 4/11 12:31:12

all of those things have occurred, but trump has personally - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:32:44

Yeah. He's bucked the system and didn't belong to the club. - jonesin - 4/11 12:40:22

And thanks for taking up for Pickled. His butt still hurts - jonesin - 4/11 12:20:18

You'll die not understanding rights. You should - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:22:13

Rights are given and taken by men. You had to agree with it - jonesin - 4/11 12:27:59

If I'm imprisoned, my right to freedom hasn't been "taken", - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:31:05

Then we agree. nm - jonesin - 4/11 12:37:16

no, we don't agree at all. (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:00:19

Yeah, we do. You can say your rights were "infringed upon" - jonesin - 4/11 13:07:53

No, because my right persists despite infringement. If I - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:12:00

I don't need a vocabulary lesson, or one on comprehension. - jonesin - 4/11 13:25:33

You clearly need a lesson in negative rights and the languag - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:38:53

I'll graciously decline. Negative rights sounds kinda like - jonesin - 4/11 13:49:00

Here, I'll do you a favor: - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:54:59

I'm not interested in discussing - jonesin - 4/11 14:21:52

this is the definition of willful ignorance. are you expres - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 14:29:09

Did you read the addendum? - jonesin - 4/11 14:31:36

yes (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 15:27:56

no, they are infringed upon by men, not taken. rights - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 12:30:21

What special - jonesin - 4/11 12:36:48

You're referring to positive rights, not the negative rights - 90Tiger STL - 4/11 13:58:25

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard