Welcome Guest

Here are the people who did not cooperate...

Posted on: January 22, 2020 at 10:59:37 CT
MrBlueSky MU
Posts:
48578
Member For:
20.45 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/09/impeachment-trump-who-has-been-subpoenaed/3912226002/

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (Sept. 27)

Democrats subpoenaed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Sept. 27 for documents related to Ukraine.

Pompeo failed to comply with the Oct. 4 deadline to produce documents.

"Sadly there have been congressional inquiries that have harassed and abused State Department employees," Pompeo told reporters in Greece during a news conference with that country's foreign minister.

"We'll obviously do all the things that we are required to do by law," he said, without specifying how long it might take to comply.

Rudy Giuliani (Sept. 30)

Democrats subpoenaed Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani on Sept. 30 for documents related to his contacts and dealings with Ukrainian officials. Giuliani had played a central role in the controversy around the pressuring of the Ukrainian government to open investigations.

He told The Washington Post on Oct. 8 he would not comply with the subpoena.

"Let them hold me in contempt. We’ll go to court. We’ll challenge the contempt," he told The Washington Post.

Vice President Mike Pence (Oct. 4)
House Democrats issued a request for documents to Vice President Mike Pence relating to the inquiry on Oct. 4, but it appears that Pence's office will not comply with the request.

"Given the scope, it does not appear to be a serious request but just another attempt by the Do Nothing Democrats to call attention to their partisan impeachment," spokeswoman Katie Waldman said in a statement.

Pence's office was given an Oct. 15 deadline to produce the documents. A failure to comply with the request could constitute "evidence of obstruction," Democrats said.

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney/The White House (Oct. 4)
House Democrats sent a letter on Oct. 4 to acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney carrying subpoenas related to documents relating to the impeachment inquiry. The White House was given a deadline of Oct. 18 to comply.

The subpoena came after the White House ignored several other requests for documents.

Defense Secretary Mark Esper/The Pentagon (Oct. 7)
House Democrats also sought information from Defense Secretary Mark Esper on any relevant information on the withholding of military aid to Ukraine

They issued a subpoena to Esper and the Department of Defense on Oct. 7.

Acting Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought (Oct. 7)
In response to media reports that Trump had ordered then-acting OMB Director Mick Mulvaney to halt military aid to Ukraine, House Democrats issued a subpoena on Oct. 7.

Speaking to reporters outside the White House on Wednesday Vought said he and his office would not be cooperating in the impeachment inquiry.

Giuliani associates Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman (Oct. 10)
Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, associates of Rudy Giuliani and Ukrainian-born business partners, were subpoenaed for documents relating to the impeachment inquiry on Oct. 10.

They were arrested on Oct. 9 on campaign finance charges and had been among the witnesses congressional investigators had hoped to question. The men helped Giuliani meet a Ukrainian prosecutor as part of Giuliani's push for an investigation into Biden.

Their federal indictment alleges they “conspired to circumvent the federal laws against foreign influence by engaging in a scheme to funnel foreign money to candidates for federal and state office so that the defendants could buy potential influence with candidates, campaigns and the candidates’ governments.”

Energy Secretary Rick Perry (Oct. 10)
The House Oversight, Intelligence, and Foreign Affairs committees subpoenaed Energy Secretary Rick Perry on Oct. 10 for documents relating to House Democrats' impeachment inquiry.

Congressional Democrats saw Perry as playing a role in "reinforcing the President's stark message to the Ukrainian President," the committees said in a letter.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Don admits to obstruction - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:41:42
     The House does not have the power to enforce their subpoenas - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/22 11:06:45
          correct, the subpoenas are worthless unless - Sal MU - 1/22 11:08:00
               Yup.(nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 1/22 11:32:49
     Trump will be president for as long as he wants - raskolnikov MU - 1/22 11:01:59
     Requires direction from the 3rd wing of govt - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/22 11:01:46
          And 2 federal courts ruled former WH counsel - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:03:44
               AFTER Congress had closed sessions - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/22 11:11:41
                    Trump has lived his whole career and business life - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:13:54
                         and not wrong(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/22 12:06:01
                    The house had to "rush" b/c Trump was an immediate - Sal MU - 1/22 11:12:13
               that's still ongoing in the courts (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 11:05:12
     He needs to be dragged off and hanged - mu7176grad MU - 1/22 10:52:46
          Or elect butt-itch. He can be queen. nm - hokie VT - 1/22 10:58:41
     Congress should be obstructed at every opportunity - Mizzou Lou KC - 1/22 10:50:52
     Ugh for the 500th time there is no such thing as a President - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 10:50:40
          100% total immunity for the executive branch as a defense - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:51:25
               Actually you are correct there. - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 10:53:20
               Who was subpoenaed? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 10:53:19
                    You serious? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:53:43
                         Yes, show us who and what documents - Sal MU - 1/22 10:55:35
                         yes. Show us the subpoenas(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/22 10:54:46
                              RE: yes. Show us the subpoenas(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:08:44
                         Who was subpoenaed? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 10:54:28
                              Here are the people who did not cooperate... - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:59:37
                                   Who was subpoenaed? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 11:00:18
                                        you're really being a ****ing idiot today(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:01:53
                                             The answer when there is no answer(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/22 11:03:19
                                                  RE: The answer when there is no answer(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:04:26
                                             Answer the question. Who and what documents were subpoenaed - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 11:03:10
                                                  Did you look at my post? JFC you're a dumb**** (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:04:02
                                                       Who was subpoenaed that refused to appear? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 11:05:04
                                                            RE: Who was subpoenaed that refused to appear? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:05:58
                                   And what did the courts decide? (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 11:00:17
     It's called executive privilege, idiot. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/22 10:48:22
          Executive privilege was not invoked. Stop lying (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:48:36
               Executive privilege wasn't used because the demtards never - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 10:52:52
                    I don't know if he's trolling or just really dumb (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:54:24
               The House failed to do their job, and decided - Sal MU - 1/22 10:50:03
                    exactly, blew some guys is trying to lie, argue semantics. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/22 10:52:23
                    RE: The House failed to do their job, and decided - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:51:40
                         I'm not claiming that the executive branch - Sal MU - 1/22 10:53:09
     RE: obstruction of congress: There is no such thing - BH O'bonga MU - 1/22 10:44:26
          this is correct (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:45:50
               It's not. But you keep doing you Trump knob boy (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:48:22
                    RE: It's not. But you keep doing you Trump knob boy (nm) - BH O'bonga MU - 1/22 11:10:29
                    Sal is a grade A spit knob polisher(nm) - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:53:33
                         Wow more fact based, evidenced based opinion. Mr Blew - hokie VT - 1/22 10:56:15
                              Sal is a Trump **********. Fact.(nm) - Gyro MU - 1/22 11:00:03
                                   If you say "Fact" after a lie, it becomes true. You win. nm - hokie VT - 1/22 11:06:00
                    It's not. It's not. Care to tell us why or how it's not?nm - hokie VT - 1/22 10:50:48
                    It is, and name calling won't change that blew some guy. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/22 10:49:18
                    It's 100% accurate (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:49:08
     Obstruction of Congress isn't a thing - Sal MU - 1/22 10:43:32
          Not responding to subpoenas and refusing... - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:52:44
               No it is not, Congress has a remedy through the Courts - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 10:54:36
                    Gyro is about to lash out (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:56:09
                         yeah he's just making $hit up now(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 11:00:29
               when did the courts decide - Sal MU - 1/22 10:54:01
                    The default for ignoring a subpoena itself... - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:57:36
                         Congress has subpoena power... - Gyro MU - 1/22 11:12:36
                              They don't have the power to enforce them - Sal MU - 1/22 11:14:11
                         lol wut? Can you find some support for this?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 11:00:17
                              And he's a "big time" lawyer, or something (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 11:01:27
                         Yeah, that's not correct (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:58:42
                              LOL, you're so ignorant you've lost... - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:59:28
          Wrong again Sal... - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:45:03
               you got a link for that slappy?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 10:51:08
               Typical. Say he's wrong, provide no evidence no example and - hokie VT - 1/22 10:46:47
               Do tell (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:45:36




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard