Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: obstruction of congress: There is no such thing

Posted on: January 22, 2020 at 10:44:26 CT
BH O'bonga MU
Posts:
26259
Member For:
5.59 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
It's actual name is 'Separation of Powers' and the Congress can not expect the Executive Branch to surrender to every fishing expedition they initiate.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Don admits to obstruction - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:41:42
     The House does not have the power to enforce their subpoenas - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/22 11:06:45
          correct, the subpoenas are worthless unless - Sal MU - 1/22 11:08:00
               Yup.(nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 1/22 11:32:49
     Trump will be president for as long as he wants - raskolnikov MU - 1/22 11:01:59
     Requires direction from the 3rd wing of govt - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/22 11:01:46
          And 2 federal courts ruled former WH counsel - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:03:44
               AFTER Congress had closed sessions - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/22 11:11:41
                    Trump has lived his whole career and business life - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:13:54
                         and not wrong(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/22 12:06:01
                    The house had to "rush" b/c Trump was an immediate - Sal MU - 1/22 11:12:13
               that's still ongoing in the courts (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 11:05:12
     He needs to be dragged off and hanged - mu7176grad MU - 1/22 10:52:46
          Or elect butt-itch. He can be queen. nm - hokie VT - 1/22 10:58:41
     Congress should be obstructed at every opportunity - Mizzou Lou KC - 1/22 10:50:52
     Ugh for the 500th time there is no such thing as a President - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 10:50:40
          100% total immunity for the executive branch as a defense - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:51:25
               Actually you are correct there. - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 10:53:20
               Who was subpoenaed? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 10:53:19
                    You serious? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:53:43
                         Yes, show us who and what documents - Sal MU - 1/22 10:55:35
                         yes. Show us the subpoenas(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/22 10:54:46
                              RE: yes. Show us the subpoenas(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:08:44
                         Who was subpoenaed? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 10:54:28
                              Here are the people who did not cooperate... - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:59:37
                                   Who was subpoenaed? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 11:00:18
                                        you're really being a ****ing idiot today(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:01:53
                                             The answer when there is no answer(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/22 11:03:19
                                                  RE: The answer when there is no answer(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:04:26
                                             Answer the question. Who and what documents were subpoenaed - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 11:03:10
                                                  Did you look at my post? JFC you're a dumb**** (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:04:02
                                                       Who was subpoenaed that refused to appear? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 11:05:04
                                                            RE: Who was subpoenaed that refused to appear? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:05:58
                                   And what did the courts decide? (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 11:00:17
     It's called executive privilege, idiot. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/22 10:48:22
          Executive privilege was not invoked. Stop lying (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:48:36
               Executive privilege wasn't used because the demtards never - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 10:52:52
                    I don't know if he's trolling or just really dumb (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:54:24
               The House failed to do their job, and decided - Sal MU - 1/22 10:50:03
                    exactly, blew some guys is trying to lie, argue semantics. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/22 10:52:23
                    RE: The House failed to do their job, and decided - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:51:40
                         I'm not claiming that the executive branch - Sal MU - 1/22 10:53:09
     RE: obstruction of congress: There is no such thing - BH O'bonga MU - 1/22 10:44:26
          this is correct (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:45:50
               It's not. But you keep doing you Trump knob boy (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:48:22
                    RE: It's not. But you keep doing you Trump knob boy (nm) - BH O'bonga MU - 1/22 11:10:29
                    Sal is a grade A spit knob polisher(nm) - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:53:33
                         Wow more fact based, evidenced based opinion. Mr Blew - hokie VT - 1/22 10:56:15
                              Sal is a Trump **********. Fact.(nm) - Gyro MU - 1/22 11:00:03
                                   If you say "Fact" after a lie, it becomes true. You win. nm - hokie VT - 1/22 11:06:00
                    It's not. It's not. Care to tell us why or how it's not?nm - hokie VT - 1/22 10:50:48
                    It is, and name calling won't change that blew some guy. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/22 10:49:18
                    It's 100% accurate (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:49:08
     Obstruction of Congress isn't a thing - Sal MU - 1/22 10:43:32
          Not responding to subpoenas and refusing... - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:52:44
               No it is not, Congress has a remedy through the Courts - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 10:54:36
                    Gyro is about to lash out (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:56:09
                         yeah he's just making $hit up now(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 11:00:29
               when did the courts decide - Sal MU - 1/22 10:54:01
                    The default for ignoring a subpoena itself... - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:57:36
                         Congress has subpoena power... - Gyro MU - 1/22 11:12:36
                              They don't have the power to enforce them - Sal MU - 1/22 11:14:11
                         lol wut? Can you find some support for this?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 11:00:17
                              And he's a "big time" lawyer, or something (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 11:01:27
                         Yeah, that's not correct (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:58:42
                              LOL, you're so ignorant you've lost... - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:59:28
          Wrong again Sal... - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:45:03
               you got a link for that slappy?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 10:51:08
               Typical. Say he's wrong, provide no evidence no example and - hokie VT - 1/22 10:46:47
               Do tell (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:45:36
     You are such a liar. Or you don't understand english. nm - hokie VT - 1/22 10:43:24




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard