Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Yeah, that's not correct (nm)

Posted on: January 22, 2020 at 10:58:42 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.94 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Don admits to obstruction - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:41:42
     The House does not have the power to enforce their subpoenas - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/22 11:06:45
          correct, the subpoenas are worthless unless - Sal MU - 1/22 11:08:00
               Yup.(nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 1/22 11:32:49
     Trump will be president for as long as he wants - raskolnikov MU - 1/22 11:01:59
     Requires direction from the 3rd wing of govt - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/22 11:01:46
          And 2 federal courts ruled former WH counsel - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:03:44
               AFTER Congress had closed sessions - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/22 11:11:41
                    Trump has lived his whole career and business life - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:13:54
                         and not wrong(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/22 12:06:01
                    The house had to "rush" b/c Trump was an immediate - Sal MU - 1/22 11:12:13
               that's still ongoing in the courts (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 11:05:12
     He needs to be dragged off and hanged - mu7176grad MU - 1/22 10:52:46
          Or elect butt-itch. He can be queen. nm - hokie VT - 1/22 10:58:41
     Congress should be obstructed at every opportunity - Mizzou Lou KC - 1/22 10:50:52
     Ugh for the 500th time there is no such thing as a President - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 10:50:40
          100% total immunity for the executive branch as a defense - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:51:25
               Actually you are correct there. - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 10:53:20
               Who was subpoenaed? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 10:53:19
                    You serious? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:53:43
                         Yes, show us who and what documents - Sal MU - 1/22 10:55:35
                         yes. Show us the subpoenas(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/22 10:54:46
                              RE: yes. Show us the subpoenas(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:08:44
                         Who was subpoenaed? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 10:54:28
                              Here are the people who did not cooperate... - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:59:37
                                   Who was subpoenaed? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 11:00:18
                                        you're really being a ****ing idiot today(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:01:53
                                             The answer when there is no answer(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/22 11:03:19
                                                  RE: The answer when there is no answer(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:04:26
                                             Answer the question. Who and what documents were subpoenaed - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 11:03:10
                                                  Did you look at my post? JFC you're a dumb**** (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:04:02
                                                       Who was subpoenaed that refused to appear? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 11:05:04
                                                            RE: Who was subpoenaed that refused to appear? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 11:05:58
                                   And what did the courts decide? (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 11:00:17
     It's called executive privilege, idiot. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/22 10:48:22
          Executive privilege was not invoked. Stop lying (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:48:36
               Executive privilege wasn't used because the demtards never - hefeweizen MU - 1/22 10:52:52
                    I don't know if he's trolling or just really dumb (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:54:24
               The House failed to do their job, and decided - Sal MU - 1/22 10:50:03
                    exactly, blew some guys is trying to lie, argue semantics. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/22 10:52:23
                    RE: The House failed to do their job, and decided - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:51:40
                         I'm not claiming that the executive branch - Sal MU - 1/22 10:53:09
     RE: obstruction of congress: There is no such thing - BH O'bonga MU - 1/22 10:44:26
          this is correct (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:45:50
               It's not. But you keep doing you Trump knob boy (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/22 10:48:22
                    RE: It's not. But you keep doing you Trump knob boy (nm) - BH O'bonga MU - 1/22 11:10:29
                    Sal is a grade A spit knob polisher(nm) - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:53:33
                         Wow more fact based, evidenced based opinion. Mr Blew - hokie VT - 1/22 10:56:15
                              Sal is a Trump **********. Fact.(nm) - Gyro MU - 1/22 11:00:03
                                   If you say "Fact" after a lie, it becomes true. You win. nm - hokie VT - 1/22 11:06:00
                    It's not. It's not. Care to tell us why or how it's not?nm - hokie VT - 1/22 10:50:48
                    It is, and name calling won't change that blew some guy. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/22 10:49:18
                    It's 100% accurate (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:49:08
     Obstruction of Congress isn't a thing - Sal MU - 1/22 10:43:32
          Not responding to subpoenas and refusing... - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:52:44
               No it is not, Congress has a remedy through the Courts - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 10:54:36
                    Gyro is about to lash out (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:56:09
                         yeah he's just making $hit up now(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 11:00:29
               when did the courts decide - Sal MU - 1/22 10:54:01
                    The default for ignoring a subpoena itself... - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:57:36
                         Congress has subpoena power... - Gyro MU - 1/22 11:12:36
                              They don't have the power to enforce them - Sal MU - 1/22 11:14:11
                         lol wut? Can you find some support for this?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 11:00:17
                              And he's a "big time" lawyer, or something (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 11:01:27
                         Yeah, that's not correct (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:58:42
                              LOL, you're so ignorant you've lost... - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:59:28
          Wrong again Sal... - Gyro MU - 1/22 10:45:03
               you got a link for that slappy?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 10:51:08
               Typical. Say he's wrong, provide no evidence no example and - hokie VT - 1/22 10:46:47
               Do tell (nm) - Sal MU - 1/22 10:45:36
     You are such a liar. Or you don't understand english. nm - hokie VT - 1/22 10:43:24




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard