Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

He had to get his amended story after colleagues talked to

Posted on: November 5, 2019 at 16:47:17 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
51161
Member For:
16.89 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
him. Yes, I find that very suspicious .

No one has yet testified that they had actual knowledge of any quid pro quo. They all felt or heard that something was wrong. Basically a bunch of staffers have testified that they disagreed with the President’s foreign policy. They do not set foreign policy and their opinions on it mean squat.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

My question is why did Sondland have to revise his statement - BigSlickTiger MU - 11/5 16:33:58
     Did Sondland lie when he first testified or when he revised - None**** MU - 11/5 17:23:17
          I believe he omitted(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 11/5 17:36:53
               Upon what objective facts is your belief based? - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/5 18:06:43
     The more important question is this: Was the request made - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/5 17:08:02
          and now there is evidence of the Obama admin State Dept - Sal MU - 11/5 17:09:00
               What evidence is that Sal? Paul Sperry or which of your - playhard NWMSU - 11/5 17:46:16
                    RE: What evidence is that Sal? Paul Sperry or which of your - Sal MU - 11/5 17:48:20
                         RE: What evidence is that Sal? Paul Sperry or which of your - playhard NWMSU - 11/5 17:57:54
                              The emails were obtained via the FOIA - Sal MU - 11/5 18:01:41
                                   I didn’t read your link, i rarely if ever do - playhard NWMSU - 11/5 18:06:45
                                        so why'd you ask? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 11/5 18:24:10
                                        you being uninformed? shocker (nm) - Sal MU - 11/5 18:07:30
                                             Lol, relying on partisan based “news” sites is - playhard NWMSU - 11/5 18:15:14
                                                  The emails were obtained via the FOIA - Sal MU - 11/5 18:24:06
     His attorney explained perjury to him - Ace AU - 11/5 16:58:21
          Did Taylor's explain it to him? (nm) - Sal MU - 11/5 16:59:09
               Taylor didn’t lie, dumb ass - Ace AU - 11/5 17:10:24
     He had to get his amended story after colleagues talked to - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/5 16:47:17
     Because schiff told him too. He is now in jeopardy(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 11/5 16:45:27
     Senators don't want to answer that question either. - StaleyTiger MU - 11/5 16:39:13
     possibly evidence of perjury - ashtray UF - 11/5 16:39:07
          You should compare his original with revised - Sal MU - 11/5 16:40:35
     He "misremembered" (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/5 16:38:15
     Because Sondland was specifically talking about - Sal MU - 11/5 16:37:37
          which was in his opening statement - Spanky KU - 11/5 16:55:28
               I don't either - Sal MU - 11/5 16:56:13
                    I think the diference is he recalled that SPECIFIC - tigerinhogtown STL - 11/5 17:42:00
     No, that is included in his original testimony - tigerinhogtown STL - 11/5 16:37:06
          It's the exact same message (nm) - Sal MU - 11/5 16:38:13




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard