Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Because Sondland was specifically talking about

Posted on: November 5, 2019 at 16:37:37 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
22.00 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Ukraine making a statement.

“I now recall speaking individually with Mr. Yermak, where I said that resumption of U.S. aid would not likely occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks,”

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/nov/5/gordon-sondland-trump-eu-ambassador-revises-testim/

Ukraine also discussed wanting to re-open a bunch of anti-corruption cases b/c Zelensky didn't trust the former admin.

Edited by Sal at 16:37:53 on 11/05/19
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

My question is why did Sondland have to revise his statement - BigSlickTiger MU - 11/5 16:33:58
     Did Sondland lie when he first testified or when he revised - None**** MU - 11/5 17:23:17
          I believe he omitted(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 11/5 17:36:53
               Upon what objective facts is your belief based? - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/5 18:06:43
     The more important question is this: Was the request made - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/5 17:08:02
          and now there is evidence of the Obama admin State Dept - Sal MU - 11/5 17:09:00
               What evidence is that Sal? Paul Sperry or which of your - playhard NWMSU - 11/5 17:46:16
                    RE: What evidence is that Sal? Paul Sperry or which of your - Sal MU - 11/5 17:48:20
                         RE: What evidence is that Sal? Paul Sperry or which of your - playhard NWMSU - 11/5 17:57:54
                              The emails were obtained via the FOIA - Sal MU - 11/5 18:01:41
                                   I didn’t read your link, i rarely if ever do - playhard NWMSU - 11/5 18:06:45
                                        so why'd you ask? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 11/5 18:24:10
                                        you being uninformed? shocker (nm) - Sal MU - 11/5 18:07:30
                                             Lol, relying on partisan based “news” sites is - playhard NWMSU - 11/5 18:15:14
                                                  The emails were obtained via the FOIA - Sal MU - 11/5 18:24:06
     His attorney explained perjury to him - Ace AU - 11/5 16:58:21
          Did Taylor's explain it to him? (nm) - Sal MU - 11/5 16:59:09
               Taylor didn’t lie, dumb ass - Ace AU - 11/5 17:10:24
     He had to get his amended story after colleagues talked to - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/5 16:47:17
     Because schiff told him too. He is now in jeopardy(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 11/5 16:45:27
     Senators don't want to answer that question either. - StaleyTiger MU - 11/5 16:39:13
     possibly evidence of perjury - ashtray UF - 11/5 16:39:07
          You should compare his original with revised - Sal MU - 11/5 16:40:35
     He "misremembered" (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/5 16:38:15
     Because Sondland was specifically talking about - Sal MU - 11/5 16:37:37
          which was in his opening statement - Spanky KU - 11/5 16:55:28
               I don't either - Sal MU - 11/5 16:56:13
                    I think the diference is he recalled that SPECIFIC - tigerinhogtown STL - 11/5 17:42:00
     No, that is included in his original testimony - tigerinhogtown STL - 11/5 16:37:06
          It's the exact same message (nm) - Sal MU - 11/5 16:38:13




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard