That's hilarious. I couldn't help but laugh at the dumbos

Posted on: April 22, 2017 at 11:35:51 CT

who would fall for that load of tripe the writer is foisting.
He twists and stretches sweet sounding rhetoric to deceive the gullible reader into believing Jesus accepts what God condemns.
He'll have you believe that Jesus really didn't say that God created man and woman and intercourse for a reason and that is the only acceptable practice. But, of course, he did. Look at Mt 19:1-8.  Afterwards, when he had finished saying all this, Jesus removed from Galilee and came into that part of Judaea which lies beyond the Jordan. 2 Great multitudes went with him, and he healed them there. 3 Then the Pharisees came to him, and put him to the test by asking, Is it right for a man to put away his wife, for whatever cause? 4 He answered, Have you never read, how he who created them, when they first came to be, created them male and female; and how he said, 5 A man, therefore, will leave his father and mother and will cling to his wife, and the two will become one flesh?[1] 6 And so they are no longer two, they are one flesh; what God, then, has joined, let not man put asunder. 7 Why then, they said, did Moses enjoin that a man might give his wife a writ of separation, and then he might put her away? 8 He told them, It was to suit your hard hearts that Moses allowed you to put your wives away; it was not so at the beginning of things. Which sets up that old "homophobe" St. Paul with Romans 1:18-32 18 God’s anger is being revealed from heaven; his anger against the impiety and wrong-doing of the men whose wrong-doing denies his truth its full scope. 19 The knowledge of God is clear to their minds; God himself has made it clear to them; 20 from the foundations of the world men have caught sight of his invisible nature, his eternal power and his divineness, as they are known through his creatures. Thus there is no excuse for them; 21 although they had the knowledge of God, they did not honour him or give thanks to him as God; they became fantastic in their notions, and their senseless hearts grew benighted; 22 they, who claimed to be so wise, turned fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the imperishable God for representations of perishable man, of bird and beast and reptile. 24 That is why God abandoned their lustful hearts to filthy practices of dishonouring their own bodies among themselves. 25 They had exchanged God’s truth for a lie, reverencing and worshipping the creature in preference to the Creator (blessed is he for ever, Amen); 26 and, in return, God abandoned them to passions which brought dishonour to themselves. Their women exchanged natural for unnatural intercourse; 27 and the men, on their side, giving up natural intercourse with women, were burnt up with desire for each other; men practising vileness with their fellow men. Thus they have received a fitting retribution for their false belief.
Yeah, Jesus was often in the company of sinners. In fact, everyone is a sinner. So he was always surrounded by sinners. But here's the difference. He didn't accept their sin. False apologists often like to cite the case of the adulteress he saved from stoning. They stop at the part where he says "I don't condemn you." But they leave out the conclusion when he tells her, "Go and SIN NO MORE."
There are several other instances in the New Testament in which homosexuality is condemned but you ought to get the idea from above. And there is no place in any of the Bible that tolerates it.