Welcome Guest

RE: Where are those “pre-vetting” requirements in the law? (nm)

Posted on: September 9, 2025 at 18:41:29 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
166925
Member For:
23.55 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
There is no single law that outlines all vetting procedures at the U.S. border. Instead, a complex framework of laws, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), presidential actions, and policies from agencies like the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), establishes the vetting process. The process varies depending on whether an individual is a U.S. citizen, a non-citizen with a visa, or seeking asylum.

Key legal authorities
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA): This is the foundational law governing U.S. immigration. Section 8 U.S. Code § 1182 lists categories of "inadmissible aliens," which include grounds for denying entry based on health, criminal history, and national security.

Presidential authority: The President can issue proclamations and executive orders to suspend or restrict the entry of foreign nationals deemed "detrimental to the interests of the United States," as authorized by Section 212(f) of the INA.
National Vetting Center (NVC): Established by a presidential memorandum (NSPM-9), the NVC coordinates screening efforts among various government agencies, including DHS, to identify potential threats. It is an interagency effort rather than a single law.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Directives: CBP, a component of DHS, creates its own specific directives for carrying out inspections at the border. This includes the authority for border searches of electronic devices, which are permitted for all persons entering or departing the U.S..
Factors considered in vetting
The laws and policies direct agencies to screen individuals for a wide range of factors. Vetting procedures for foreign nationals are extensive and include:
Criminal history: Background checks are conducted to identify previous criminal convictions or activities.
National security threats: Vetting aims to identify individuals who may pose a threat to national security or public safety. This includes checking for affiliations with terrorist organizations.
Prior immigration violations: Lawful entry is denied to those who have previously been removed or deported, with restrictions on re-entry that can last for years.
Health and public safety: Individuals may be denied entry if they have a communicable disease of public health significance or a history of drug abuse.
Financial stability: A review of assets, resources, and financial status can be part of the vetting process for those seeking to immigrate.
Online presence: For visa applicants, especially students and exchange visitors, vetting can include a review of social media to identify security risks.
Vetting based on legal status
The intensity of vetting can vary based on an individual's status.
U.S. citizens: While subject to inspection, U.S. citizens cannot be denied entry. However, their electronic devices may be searched, though their refusal to cooperate will not bar their entry.
Non-citizens: All non-citizens are subject to inspection and can be denied admission based on the grounds of inadmissibility outlined in the INA.
Asylum seekers: The rules are constantly evolving, but applicants are subject to screening for "credible fear" or "reasonable fear" of persecution, depending on their point of entry and the administration's policy at the time.

***


8 U.S. Code § 1182, known as the Immigrants and Nationality Act (INA) Section 212, defines grounds for alien inadmissibility to the United States. This includes reasons such as security threats, health concerns like vaccine-preventable diseases, criminal conduct including prostitution and trafficking, and past involvement in Nazi persecution or genocide, among many others. The statute also grants the President broad authority under § 1182(f) to suspend the entry of any aliens or classes of aliens if deemed detrimental to the nation's interests.
Key Aspects of 8 U.S. Code § 1182
Inadmissibility Grounds
: The core of the statute outlines various reasons an alien may be deemed inadmissible, including:
Health-Related Grounds: Failure to provide proof of vaccinations for certain diseases, or the presence of a physical or mental disorder that could pose a threat to others.
Criminal and Related Grounds: Engaging in or attempting to procure prostitution or commercialized vice, and certain past or present criminal activities.
Security and Related Grounds: Seeking to enter to engage in espionage, sabotage, or other unlawful activities against the U.S. government.
Past Persecution: Involvement in Nazi persecution or genocide.
Misrepresentation: False representations of U.S. citizenship.
Presidential Authority
: Under § 1182(f), the President can suspend the entry of any aliens or classes of aliens if their entry is deemed "detrimental to the interests of the United States".
Waivers
: While the statute lists grounds for inadmissibility, certain provisions may allow for waivers, allowing individuals who would otherwise be inadmissible to still enter the U.S. under specific circumstances.
Adoption Provisions
: The statute includes provisions related to vaccinations for adopted children, requiring adoptive parents to provide a vaccination affidavit

Edited by 90Tiger at 18:42:06 on 09/09/25
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Show me your papers. - TigerMatt STL - 9/9 16:31:05
     appeal to (the stupidest) authority (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 17:58:14
     There is only one dumber judge on the SC(nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 9/9 17:27:38
     Using Sotomayor as your defense is, well, LMFAO (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 9/9 17:19:38
     calm down karen - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/9 16:59:54
          Sorry. Do I need to dumb it down for you?(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 9/9 17:02:44
               RE: Sorry. Do I need to dumb it down: I don't think you - BH O'bonga MU - 9/9 17:25:29
               No, just try talking normally, instead of whiny bytch mode. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/9 17:08:22
                    I am betting he has quite the resting bìtch face.(nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 9/9 17:11:13
     should i post Kavanaugh's concurrence? - blake1771 MU - 9/9 16:58:12
     Souter-mayor? Justice Jiggery Pokery?? - MU Diaspora MU - 9/9 16:53:49
     RE: Show me your papers. - BH O'bonga MU - 9/9 16:49:12
          Is skin color and language probable cause?(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 9/9 17:02:04
               not if that's all that's used, which it isn't. and probable - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 17:59:08
               yes partially. totality of the circumstances. nothing in - blake1771 MU - 9/9 17:27:11
               RE: skin color and language: ICE doesn't need PC to detain - BH O'bonga MU - 9/9 17:24:28
               Partly. (nm) - Outsider MU - 9/9 17:13:17
     Soto is in the minority. That's why she wrote a dissenting - BH O'bonga MU - 9/9 16:43:48
     Funny how the left has no problem with the Biden - Outsider MU - 9/9 16:40:24
          RE: Funny how the left has no problem with the Biden - sarasotatiger MU - 9/9 16:42:19
               immigration law - they weren't interviewed/vetted prior - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 17:59:58
                    That’s not in the law. (nm) - haeffb MU - 9/9 18:01:46
                         i know you don't like this, but there actually are Pre-vetti - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:22:39
                              Where are those “pre-vetting” requirements in the law? (nm) - haeffb MU - 9/9 18:31:08
                                   RE: Where are those “pre-vetting” requirements in the law? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:41:29
                                        RE: Where are those “pre-vetting” requirements in the law? (nm) - haeffb MU - 9/9 21:10:59
                                        As a point of fact, Presidential actios and agency policy - haeffb MU - 9/9 18:47:54
                                             read - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:52:30
                                        Thank you for establishing that I am correct. - haeffb MU - 9/9 18:44:04
                                             RE: Thank you for establishing that I am correct. - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:48:53
                                                  how did you ignore this??? - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 19:01:57
                                                       “Grounds for denying entry” - haeffb MU - 9/9 20:15:50
                                                            haeff, wadr, the law requires the person satisfy - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 20:34:04
                                                                 It may be illegal for someone to enter - haeffb MU - 9/9 20:51:48
                                                  hardly; that implies (if you had read) there are many - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:49:44
                                                       It’s not childish to draw the distinction between - haeffb MU - 9/9 18:53:27
                                                            aslo, if you had bothered to read it, the LAW itself - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:57:21
                                                            You're ignoring the immigration law itself here and focusing - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:55:26
                                                                 Because it’s your contention that Biden broke the law. - haeffb MU - 9/9 19:06:47
                                                                      he abdicated responsibility for enforcing the law. call - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 19:09:51
                                                                           Except that Congress did not pass 1000 screening - haeffb MU - 9/9 19:15:37
                                                                                yes, it is required by law - set legally by DHS under the - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 19:18:03
                                                                                     DHS can’t make law. (nm) - haeffb MU - 9/9 19:24:51
                                                                                          No, it can make vetting requirements under the law. you're - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 19:51:37
                                                                                               And you're defending the administrative state, commie (nm) - Seagull MU - 9/10 07:07:14
                                                                                               And another President’s agency changing those requirements - haeffb MU - 9/9 20:12:49
                                                                                                    no, he didn't enforce immigration law as passed by - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 20:39:54
                                                                                                    it isn't policy, haeff. It's immigration law (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 20:37:17
                                                                                                         What law? (nm) - haeffb MU - 9/9 20:52:02
                         RE: That’s not in the law. (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:20:44
                              None of that says vetting. (nm) - haeffb MU - 9/9 18:29:35
                         it is (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:15:28
                              It is not. - haeffb MU - 9/9 18:24:12
                                   10 time convicted felon from country A walks into US border - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:30:55
                                   who do you think determines that the person meets the - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:26:59
                                        That’s determined at the asylum hearing. - haeffb MU - 9/9 18:30:21
                                             No, haeff. The hearing is a formal event. the vetting happen - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:32:58
                                                  Like you just have faith - haeffb MU - 9/9 18:38:10
                                                       and here was biden's hail mary order that has - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:46:36
                                                            It is not law. Presidential policy is not law. (nm) - haeffb MU - 9/9 18:49:09
                                                                 of course it is - it is under the power of law and carries - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:51:25
                                                                      Only Congress can create law. - haeffb MU - 9/9 20:32:34
                                                                           congress passes law all the time which allows - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 20:42:38
                                                       or - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:42:32
                                                  It astounds me that you believe something is in the law - haeffb MU - 9/9 18:36:03
                                                       RE: It astounds me that you believe something is in the law - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:42:39
                                   it is - 90Tiger STL - 9/9 18:25:27
               RE: Funny how the left has no problem with the Biden - BH O'bonga MU - 9/9 16:44:55
          Is Missouri helping people break the law by licensing the - TigerMatt STL - 9/9 16:42:18
               RE: Is Missouri helping people break the law by licensing the - sarasotatiger MU - 9/9 16:42:44
     Because your Belief system says its wrong - tcat KC - 9/9 16:37:55
          Sure. Let’s turn the system upside down where proof of - TigerMatt STL - 9/9 16:39:54
               That's what believe all women proposed. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/9 17:02:25
                    All you tards can do is appeal to other things to justify - TigerMatt STL - 9/9 17:03:40
               So rich. - tcat KC - 9/9 16:49:17
                    I take it you are an atheist then and not a Christian.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 9/9 16:52:01
                         Why does my religion matter - tcat KC - 9/9 16:55:41
                              Because Jesus taught empathy, which you reject. Therefore - TigerMatt STL - 9/9 16:57:08
                                   Jesus Taught Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to - tcat KC - 9/9 17:07:06
                                        That had nothing to do with empathy. That was a response to - TigerMatt STL - 9/9 17:08:25
                                             No, that was a question on following the law - tcat KC - 9/9 17:12:23
                                                  You must have missed the lesson the law isn’t above - TigerMatt STL - 9/9 17:17:17
                                                       Aww, you missed the whole point of that teaching - tcat KC - 9/9 17:25:44
               Biden turned it upside down, Trump is just trying to - Outsider MU - 9/9 16:41:41
                    Right the ship by presuming guilt. (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 9/9 16:43:23
                         Sorry, but just because you people disobeyed the law to - Outsider MU - 9/9 16:45:14
                              The Constitution is nothing more than words on parchment as - TigerMatt STL - 9/9 16:47:17
                                   Not according to the SCOTUS. (nm) - Outsider MU - 9/9 16:49:05
          yes, almost everyone carries ID. illegally immigrants in - blake1771 MU - 9/9 17:00:11
               ID is not proof of citizenship. As a cop, you should know - Ace UNC - 9/9 18:05:18




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard