Welcome Guest

RE: Sorry, that was the judge who didn’t release: Neither

Posted on: August 13, 2025 at 07:36:56 CT

BH O'bonga MU

Posts:

27275

Member For:

5.78 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

judges not the DOJ release raw investigative information to satisfy the prurient interests of the public. My advice to you is to review testimony, evidence and other materials used in criminal and civil court proceedings and discount media speculation to the contrary.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Trump taking over DC police is just a distraction for the - TigerMatt STL - 8/12 23:29:27

lol editing a post to comment on 4tigs post - Bosalphus KC - 8/13 09:08:43

Do you mean this? - haeffb MU - 8/13 05:15:26

RE: Do you mean this?: Do you understand what prosecutors - BH O'bonga MU - 8/13 07:31:59

So you quote someone you didn't name who said - hokie VT - 8/13 06:33:02

Sorry, that was the judge who didn’t release the - haeffb MU - 8/13 07:13:28

RE: Sorry, that was the judge who didn’t release: Neither - BH O'bonga MU - 8/13 07:36:56

Which part of “that is the judge’s official Court opinion” - haeffb MU - 8/13 08:02:56

RE: Which part of “that is the judge’s official Court opinion” - BH O'bonga MU - 8/13 08:19:09

I quoted the judges ruling. (nm) - haeffb MU - 8/13 08:27:33

RE: I quoted the judges ruling. (nm) - BH O'bonga MU - 8/13 10:53:29

He quoted the linked document, dimwit (nm) - Seagull MU - 8/13 06:40:43