Welcome Guest

Do you mean this?

Posted on: August 13, 2025 at 05:15:26 CT
haeffb MU
Posts:
13261
Member For:
26.58 yrs
Level:
Moderator
M.O.B. Votes:
0
”A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government’s motion for their unsealing was aimed not at “transparency” but at diversion—aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such.”
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     lol editing a post to comment on 4tigs post - Bosalphus KC - 8/13 09:08:43
     Do you mean this? - haeffb MU - 8/13 05:15:26
          RE: Do you mean this?: Do you understand what prosecutors - BH O'bonga MU - 8/13 07:31:59
          So you quote someone you didn't name who said - hokie VT - 8/13 06:33:02
               Sorry, that was the judge who didn’t release the - haeffb MU - 8/13 07:13:28
                    RE: Sorry, that was the judge who didn’t release: Neither - BH O'bonga MU - 8/13 07:36:56
                         Which part of “that is the judge’s official Court opinion” - haeffb MU - 8/13 08:02:56
                              RE: Which part of “that is the judge’s official Court opinion” - BH O'bonga MU - 8/13 08:19:09
                                   I quoted the judges ruling. (nm) - haeffb MU - 8/13 08:27:33
                                        RE: I quoted the judges ruling. (nm) - BH O'bonga MU - 8/13 10:53:29
               He quoted the linked document, dimwit (nm) - Seagull MU - 8/13 06:40:43




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard