Straw man much?
Posted on: July 16, 2025 at 20:18:04 CT
JeffB
MU
Posts:
72901
Member For:
21.63 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Your assertion:
1. "NO ONE knows what is in these files except for a few of Trump's Federales"
I responded with a pretty extensive list of people who had varying degrees of knowledge of allegations against Epstein, including those who compiled, analyzed and stored the files in question for years.
Your response:
"You think the evidence against Epstein is in the public record?"
Were you even paying attention wo what I wrote? You give an absurd emotional response that could be Exhibit A in 90Tiger's case that you give emotional responses, disregarding facts and logic.
2. "you think that Maxwell can counter what she does not even know."
I responded that your assertion that she had no idea of the evidence used against her in trial was absurd: "Do you really think that they can convict her without letting her or her attorneys know what evidence they have against her?"
You again give an emotional, irrational response.
"As for Maxwell, she was tried and convicted and you seem to think evidence against her was made-up and pretend by HILLARY?"
I never said the "evidence against her was made-up and pretend by HILLARY". You need to read and understand what people are actually saying before responding in such emotional fashion.
I was repeating what was said in the video... Trump had said that the Epstein files were a hoax perpetrated by his predecessors, including HIllary, the FBI etc.... AND that contention could and would be used by Maxwell to allege that the evidence used against her in trial was tainted and her conviction should be overturned.