Welcome Guest

Straw man much?

Posted on: July 16, 2025 at 20:18:04 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72901
Member For:
21.63 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Your assertion:

1. "NO ONE knows what is in these files except for a few of Trump's Federales"

I responded with a pretty extensive list of people who had varying degrees of knowledge of allegations against Epstein, including those who compiled, analyzed and stored the files in question for years.

Your response:
"You think the evidence against Epstein is in the public record?"

Were you even paying attention wo what I wrote? You give an absurd emotional response that could be Exhibit A in 90Tiger's case that you give emotional responses, disregarding facts and logic.

2. "you think that Maxwell can counter what she does not even know."

I responded that your assertion that she had no idea of the evidence used against her in trial was absurd: "Do you really think that they can convict her without letting her or her attorneys know what evidence they have against her?"

You again give an emotional, irrational response.

"As for Maxwell, she was tried and convicted and you seem to think evidence against her was made-up and pretend by HILLARY?"

I never said the "evidence against her was made-up and pretend by HILLARY". You need to read and understand what people are actually saying before responding in such emotional fashion.

I was repeating what was said in the video... Trump had said that the Epstein files were a hoax perpetrated by his predecessors, including HIllary, the FBI etc.... AND that contention could and would be used by Maxwell to allege that the evidence used against her in trial was tainted and her conviction should be overturned.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     What utter horsesht - and you buy it. Funny(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 7/16 18:28:56
          Please expound upon your opinion. Is there a particular - JeffB MU - 7/16 18:37:29
               Well, apparently NO ONE knows what is in these files - raskolnikov MU - 7/16 19:14:23
                    If there was anything incriminating in the Epstein files, - BH O'bonga MU - 7/16 20:32:24
                         False (nm) - Seagull MU - 7/17 06:16:59
                         That isn't necessarily true. If the information was incrimin - JeffB MU - 7/16 21:39:44
                         NO - raskolnikov MU - 7/16 21:16:42
                    biden's federales had the files for 4 years, rask (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/16 19:52:50
                         Oh I forgot all that stuff he and his followers were - raskolnikov MU - 7/16 19:56:36
                              I didn't say they were talking about it, rask (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/16 19:59:04
                                   Thanks for proving my point(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 7/16 21:11:18
                    I disagree with a couple of your premises: - JeffB MU - 7/16 19:43:12
                         Think what you want - raskolnikov MU - 7/16 19:54:41
                              Straw man much? - JeffB MU - 7/16 20:18:04
                                   "Dug up her grave and built a cage w/her bones" - raskolnikov MU - 7/16 21:18:28
                                        What the heck are you going on about? (nm) - JeffB MU - 7/16 21:43:02
                                   i warned you (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/16 20:26:51
               the grounds for rask are always the same - the conclusions - 90Tiger STL - 7/16 19:01:41
                    The fck you talking about "(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 7/16 19:25:00
                         You. Your posting history. You react to something (like this - 90Tiger STL - 7/16 19:53:57
                              Prove it then, if it is so simple(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 7/16 19:55:16
                                   A polite way is just calling it directionally motivated - TigerMatt STL - 7/16 20:21:42
                                   more evidence - 90Tiger STL - 7/16 20:01:04
                                        RE: more evidence - TigerMatt STL - 7/16 20:24:48
                                   here's evidence - 90Tiger STL - 7/16 19:59:57
                                   Fvck you, rask (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/16 19:59:15
                         Your posting history.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 7/16 19:51:31
                    Thanks for the reminder. (nm) - JeffB MU - 7/16 19:05:10
     Let’s play conspiracy. Say a foreign entity (China, Russia - TigerMatt STL - 7/16 18:09:12
          Michael Knowles is saying what MAGA is clamoring for is - JeffB MU - 7/16 18:30:35
               There is an argument from a utilitarian philosophy that - TigerMatt STL - 7/16 18:45:10
                    Yeah, thanks. I reject utilitarian philosophy, however. - JeffB MU - 7/16 19:14:55
                         It isn’t some US leaders. It’s been pretty much ever US - TigerMatt STL - 7/16 19:50:59
          Those were questions, but don't you think Trump's claims - JeffB MU - 7/16 17:54:53
               Question: The Clinton foundation was raking in the cash - tigertix MU - 7/16 18:00:38
                    I'm not sure what you mean? Could you please clarify: - JeffB MU - 7/16 18:33:41
                         Then you better start repeating the party line, mister (nm) - Seagull MU - 7/16 18:49:24
                         This was/is a crime that wasn't speculation like the list.nm - tigertix MU - 7/16 18:49:08
                              I was all for prison, or at least prosecution and justice - JeffB MU - 7/16 19:03:59




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard