Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

...by other non-partisan judges, of course. Did you read

Posted on: June 29, 2025 at 17:55:37 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
163473
Member For:
23.37 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
the OP, haeff?

SCOTUS is corrupt.

But hey, let's not let facts get in the way of a good narrative.

To answer your question: Yes, create a class and sue, as was outlined.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

One corrupt hand washes another - JG MU - 6/29 12:36:30
     Roll tide, liar. nm - MU Diaspora MU - 6/29 16:09:43
     JG and Yahoo - mu7176grad MU - 6/29 14:32:18
     Are both of your hands on the keyboard? I bet not. (nm) - Outsider MU - 6/29 14:00:30
          He will never learn............nm - tigertix MU - 6/29 14:25:23
     Enjoy your Sunday - Calca STL - 6/29 13:44:33
     buried in the emotional and illogical opinions of - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 13:12:32
          The reasoning is actually flawed. Irreparable harm and - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 13:30:38
               that has nothing to do with the reasoning offered. Republica - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 13:45:47
                    The ruling is completely back asswards citing - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 14:17:00
                         ok matt, whatever you say (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 14:26:27
          checks and balances - JG MU - 6/29 13:21:47
               the court addressed that, specifically. You can't have 700 - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 13:47:09
                    No, he didn’t. - haeffb MU - 6/29 17:04:04
                         data - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 17:19:11
                         And if different district judges view the issue differently - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 17:14:57
                              And if the Judge rules incorrectly - haeffb MU - 6/29 17:39:02
                                   ...by other non-partisan judges, of course. Did you read - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 17:55:37
                                        I read the OP, but not the links. - haeffb MU - 6/29 18:02:55
                                             it's not a summons unless you make it one (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 18:05:06
                                                  When you put words in my mouth… (nm) - haeffb MU - 6/29 18:07:30
                    no - JG MU - 6/29 13:54:01
                         not at all. it cuts at the root the strategy of challenging - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 14:27:29
                              The court needs to have jurisdiction. Maybe his strategy - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 15:07:25
                                   It's not about judge shopping exclusively, it's about - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 15:29:36
                                        I’d argue the track record of losses is stronger evidence - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 15:46:05
                                             I know you would, good for you, Matt! Looks like he's - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 15:51:42
                                                  Good for him I guess. Potentially bad for Americans who live - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 16:00:17
                                                       I guess. I'm not the guy who argues for M v. M and federal - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 16:07:43
               Ironically, it was the GOP that opened the floodgates - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 13:32:43
               You should not be allowed to vote - NPDTiger MU - 6/29 13:27:58
                    As you suggest - JG MU - 6/29 13:30:55
                         It is scary considering you've called...multiple times...for - MIZ45 MU - 6/29 13:33:03
                    Here he is when SCOTUS stepped up to his Biden - MIZ45 MU - 6/29 13:28:38
                         Dude is brain dead(nm) - NPDTiger MU - 6/29 13:39:54
               When the judiciary stepped in and stopped your dictator Joe, - MIZ45 MU - 6/29 13:27:16
     I disagree with MAGA. They do deserve Trump. - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 12:41:56




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard