Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

It's not about judge shopping exclusively, it's about

Posted on: June 29, 2025 at 15:29:36 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
163473
Member For:
23.37 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
taking up every issue and seeing what sticks.

Given the courts are all partisan, I'd go for it too.

Given that you're against nullification and full federal powers of constitutionality, deal with it, bro.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

One corrupt hand washes another - JG MU - 6/29 12:36:30
     Roll tide, liar. nm - MU Diaspora MU - 6/29 16:09:43
     JG and Yahoo - mu7176grad MU - 6/29 14:32:18
     Are both of your hands on the keyboard? I bet not. (nm) - Outsider MU - 6/29 14:00:30
          He will never learn............nm - tigertix MU - 6/29 14:25:23
     Enjoy your Sunday - Calca STL - 6/29 13:44:33
     buried in the emotional and illogical opinions of - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 13:12:32
          The reasoning is actually flawed. Irreparable harm and - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 13:30:38
               that has nothing to do with the reasoning offered. Republica - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 13:45:47
                    The ruling is completely back asswards citing - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 14:17:00
                         ok matt, whatever you say (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 14:26:27
          checks and balances - JG MU - 6/29 13:21:47
               the court addressed that, specifically. You can't have 700 - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 13:47:09
                    No, he didn’t. - haeffb MU - 6/29 17:04:04
                         data - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 17:19:11
                         And if different district judges view the issue differently - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 17:14:57
                              And if the Judge rules incorrectly - haeffb MU - 6/29 17:39:02
                                   ...by other non-partisan judges, of course. Did you read - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 17:55:37
                                        I read the OP, but not the links. - haeffb MU - 6/29 18:02:55
                                             it's not a summons unless you make it one (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 18:05:06
                                                  When you put words in my mouth… (nm) - haeffb MU - 6/29 18:07:30
                    no - JG MU - 6/29 13:54:01
                         not at all. it cuts at the root the strategy of challenging - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 14:27:29
                              The court needs to have jurisdiction. Maybe his strategy - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 15:07:25
                                   It's not about judge shopping exclusively, it's about - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 15:29:36
                                        I’d argue the track record of losses is stronger evidence - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 15:46:05
                                             I know you would, good for you, Matt! Looks like he's - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 15:51:42
                                                  Good for him I guess. Potentially bad for Americans who live - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 16:00:17
                                                       I guess. I'm not the guy who argues for M v. M and federal - 90Tiger STL - 6/29 16:07:43
               Ironically, it was the GOP that opened the floodgates - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 13:32:43
               You should not be allowed to vote - NPDTiger MU - 6/29 13:27:58
                    As you suggest - JG MU - 6/29 13:30:55
                         It is scary considering you've called...multiple times...for - MIZ45 MU - 6/29 13:33:03
                    Here he is when SCOTUS stepped up to his Biden - MIZ45 MU - 6/29 13:28:38
                         Dude is brain dead(nm) - NPDTiger MU - 6/29 13:39:54
               When the judiciary stepped in and stopped your dictator Joe, - MIZ45 MU - 6/29 13:27:16
     I disagree with MAGA. They do deserve Trump. - TigerMatt STL - 6/29 12:41:56




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard