Welcome Guest

RE: I guess scotus can't intervene in a corrupt trial until

Posted on: May 7, 2024 at 09:00:02 CT
sarasotatiger MU
Posts:
19470
Member For:
12.20 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
the ruling on this, is that a gag order doesn't always violate the first amendment and the right to a fair trial. because in this case the social media statement can intimidate and a corrupted trial could happen. it goes both ways.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Jesus Christ what a partisan hack you are - JG A - 5/7 12:38:45
     RE: I guess scotus can't intervene in a corrupt trial until - sarasotatiger MU - 5/7 09:00:02
     They could ask for an interlocutory appeal - Mormad MU - 5/6 21:11:57
          They clearly are - Sal CMSU - 5/7 08:33:33
          They are not unconstitutional because Trump said so. Why - hokie VT - 5/7 06:42:36
               if trump was any other US citizen - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/7 07:34:20
                    It might be time for - GODZILLA MU - 5/7 09:02:43
                         RE: It might be time for you to - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/7 10:37:07
                              no - GODZILLA MU - 5/7 11:20:04
     In general the plaintiff - MrTruman2U MU - 5/6 20:50:17
          Seems odd that if the trial is as corrupt as it seems, - hokie VT - 5/7 06:40:25




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard