Welcome Guest

Exactly. I'd love for the Block M to be Mizzou's, but it's

Posted on: April 20, 2024 at 11:02:06 CT

zounami MU

Posts:

65639

Member For:

10.02 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

not, it's Michigan's — and nothing will ever change that.

I think the oval Tiger is pretty good, I'm just saying that the logo looks sharper without it... especially at smaller scales.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

ROCK M lighting - tigereyez MU - 4/19 13:22:32

It's an architectural rendering. It's not a photograph of - phrejd KC - 4/20 16:24:57

RE: ROCK M lighting - tmb333 MU - 4/20 13:45:56

I think it looks great, but if the ‘M’ is going to continue - MoGold MU - 4/20 09:54:14

RE: I think it looks great, but if the ‘M’ is going to continue - CPA MU - 4/20 13:03:48

"Tiger Logo" = Mizzou..... "Block M" = Michigan..... - zounami MU - 4/20 10:21:49

I hate to agree about the block M. I’ve worn a Mizzou - SSN 780 MU - 4/20 14:13:23

Michigan has a trademark on the Block M and was using it - MU-TULSA MU - 4/20 10:58:11

Mizzou’s first team used the Block M in 1890 - SSN 780 MU - 4/20 13:36:52

Exactly. I'd love for the Block M to be Mizzou's, but it's - zounami MU - 4/20 11:02:06

RE: ROCK M lighting - ToothlessTig MU - 4/19 22:22:01

They could easily add seats to right and left - sfprman MU - 4/19 16:00:05

I'd see if we can sell out for a few - SabertoothTiger MU - 4/19 13:54:39

Not only that but the sight lines would be way worse as - TigerFan92 STL - 4/19 21:31:17

RE: Not only that but the sight lines would be way worse as - Drydock MU - 4/20 09:26:25

RE: Not only that but the sight lines would be way worse as - CPA MU - 4/20 08:27:59

I like this - MoArk MU - 4/19 19:19:20

No, I think that is the way - BigDave MU - 4/19 14:36:52

How would that work without tearing down part of - TigerMatt MISS - 4/19 15:30:36

It's a separate structure - BigDave MU - 4/19 17:03:55

How would it not look retarded? A chunk of it would be - TigerMatt MISS - 4/19 21:44:59