 |
|
Under Kim or under Cuonzo?
Posted on: November 21, 2023 at 10:37:55 CT
FIJItiger MU
Posts:
147988
Member For:
22.53 yrs
Level:
Moderator
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The one under Cuonzo ended up being an example of the situation I'm talking about. While it was still a bad loss, that UMKC team went on to be a reasonably decent team.
The one under Kim was horrendous and proved to be so even at seasons end, and was the worst loss in program history until Cuonzo surpassed it with other examples later. I didn't wait to proclaim it because of the off the court impact that falling so flat and being so unprepared would have (and did) on any needed momentum that staff required to be viewed as legitimate. It basically decimated any chance at success for that staff in the very first game.
But my point is there are a lot of no-name teams that programs lose to and based on shock value they appear terrible, and then at seasons end they turn out to be somewhat quality opponents.
The one under Kim was horrendous and proved to be so even at seasons end, and was the worst loss in program history until Cuonzo surpassed it with other examples later. I didn't wait to proclaim it because of the off the court impact that falling so flat and being so unprepared would have (and did) on any needed momentum that staff required to be viewed as legitimate. It basically decimated any chance at success for that staff in the very first game.
But my point is there are a lot of no-name teams that programs lose to and based on shock value they appear terrible, and then at seasons end they turn out to be somewhat quality opponents.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Under Kim or under Cuonzo? - FIJItiger MU - 11/21 10:37:55