Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

I never implied that at all. I’ll try one more time and you

Posted on: April 6, 2023 at 08:54:18 CT

Outsider MU

Posts:

35954

Member For:

19.29 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

can either accept it or not. The point was about using the media and the reactions of a radical faction of their followers to reverse a potential decision by leaking that potential decision in advance. The media ran with it in every form of communication (newspaper, tv, radio, talk shows, social media, Hollywood, etc.) blasting the decision. As you know, there were protests all over the country as well as nightly protests outside the homes of the justices. This was the radical faction part of the equation. So to answer meats question, what’s the big deal about the leak, it’s that the leak was to get these balls rolling. The fact that a nut job decided to take this call to action to mean assassination, is on him.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

SCOTUS leaker, chicom balloons, Nashville manifesto. Not - hokie VT - 4/6 06:34:42

RE: SCOTUS leaker, chicom balloons, Nashville manifesto. Not - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 4/6 07:54:45

RE: SCOTUS leaker, chicom balloons, Nashville manifesto. Not - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:13:10

Frankly I'm not concerned - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 4/6 08:14:17

lol coming from a guy who thinks the Russians - Sal CMSU - 4/6 08:15:14

And is ok with the govt mowing down American citizens(nm) - redngray MU - 4/6 08:49:33

He named himself, hoax. Nm - hokie VT - 4/6 08:39:45

Why is the SCOTUS leaker a big deal?(nm) - meatiger MU - 4/6 06:39:52

RE: Why is the SCOTUS leaker a big deal?(nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:32:08

The leaker wasn't from the left. - DC Jayhawk KU - 4/6 08:52:48

RE: The leaker wasn't from the left. - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:59:14

understand, and appreciate the clarity. (nm) - DC Jayhawk KU - 4/6 09:00:08

based off what evidence? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 4/6 08:54:22

The IRS being sent after people is the existing norm. - ummmm MU - 4/6 07:43:09

This is true. It wasn’t prior to Obama. (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:45:08

Incorrect - ummmm MU - 4/6 07:48:03

RE: Incorrect - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:55:48

RE: Why is the SCOTUS leaker a big deal?(nm) - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:36:07

I know, let's dissolve govt totally. Anarchy has always - hokie VT - 4/6 07:50:49

big government has never worked, either - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:54:15

Yippee! Can’t wait, get the corn a poppin. (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:58:56

I agree (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:00:38

RE: Why is the SCOTUS leaker a big deal?(nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:41:32

Good post. Nm - hokie VT - 4/6 08:19:43

If you had an impartial media. Otherwise what you - tman MU - 4/6 07:40:38

if all information is released - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:42:23

Do you really think you’ll see an “impartial” media again… - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:51:39

RE: Do you really think you’ll see an “impartial” media again… - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:55:52

And how does it get released meat? I mean, getting - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:22:31

RE: And how does it get released meat? I mean, getting - meatiger MU - 4/6 08:25:53

Media is not likely to be impartial, but it can at least be - hokie VT - 4/6 07:55:12

media is the propaganda arm of government - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:01:05

RE: Media is not likely to be impartial, but it can at least be - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:56:44

Govt keeping things secret is a problem… - Outsider MU - 4/6 09:17:28

You're arguing two separate things. One is govt hiding - hokie VT - 4/6 08:13:43

RE: You're arguing two separate things. One is govt hiding - meatiger MU - 4/6 08:28:05

If they don't need to be released immediately, why do - hokie VT - 4/6 08:41:07

RE: If they don't need to be released immediately, why do - meatiger MU - 4/6 09:00:59

So you have no issue with holding two conflicting opinions - hokie VT - 4/6 09:03:50

it never has been impartial (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:54:39

Probably not, but they seemed to do a better - Outsider MU - 4/6 09:08:22

they didn't do a better job of it - ashtray UF - 4/6 09:13:24

Why would that be? Nm - hokie VT - 4/6 07:45:52

No it doesnt. It would be no different - GODZILLA MU - 4/6 07:45:05

RE: No it doesnt. It would be no different - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:54:51

There is actual info out now about the - GODZILLA MU - 4/6 07:56:48

RE: There is actual info out now about the - meatiger MU - 4/6 08:02:52

RE: Why is the SCOTUS leaker a big deal?: It wan another - BH O'bonga MU - 4/6 07:18:07

what's the problem with that? - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:28:30

RE: what's the problem with that? - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:35:14

who did the dems attempt to assassinate? (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:42:52

Did you not follow the SCOTUS abortion saga? (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:47:24

do you not answer questions? (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:52:57

Hahaha! Ok, I’ll play. Kavenaugh. Your turn. (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:57:21

which Democrat tried to assassinate him? (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:58:40

Did I say a “democrat” tried to assassinate him? (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:08:16

Nicholas Roske(nm) - GODZILLA MU - 4/6 08:00:56

which political office did he hold? (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:01:47

So assassins now have to hold office? (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:09:21

you said "The Dems tried to have him assasinated" - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:14:43

Ok, so when you put things in quotes, that means it - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:29:03

fair enough, but you did imply that the Democrat party - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:30:59

I never implied that at all. I’ll try one more time and you - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:54:18

so that radical faction wouldn't have protested if - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:59:48

Of course all of that would have happened… - Outsider MU - 4/6 09:05:02

did they make a different decision? - ashtray UF - 4/6 09:07:11

Ok. Thanks for the discussion, I’m sure we’ll meet again. (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 09:09:29

I guess being a registered - GODZILLA MU - 4/6 08:11:59

Lib definitions like sex, are fluid and can be changed to - hokie VT - 4/6 08:23:45

because in your pea brain any criminal act committed by - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:26:25

That’s not what has been said and perverts the entire - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:33:19

I didn't say that. You implied it (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 09:01:14

Because it's another example of our govt not being honest - hokie VT - 4/6 06:43:45

Before they decided you have no right to know who - ashtray UF - 4/6 06:47:05

How is it dishonest - meatiger MU - 4/6 06:46:36

Some things, a small percentage need to be done in private, - hokie VT - 4/6 07:01:02

RE: Some things, a small percentage need to be done in private, - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:04:19

"Right" The demonstrations occurred before the decision - tman MU - 4/6 07:44:13

Oh that is awesome. - GODZILLA MU - 4/6 07:20:55

I explained why the process needs to be done in - hokie VT - 4/6 07:09:02

so I guess government should also decide what information - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:17:55

Open floor debate should not be allowed - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:20:10

You really want supreme court conversations done in an open - hokie VT - 4/6 07:32:01

RE: You really want supreme court conversations done in an open - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:34:53

How about this meat… Let's have all conversations by the - hokie VT - 4/6 07:42:06

why should they have privacy in their conversations? - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:44:03

I would take that vs the current method, yes(nm) - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:43:07

How old are you? No one who has ever worked in an office - hokie VT - 4/6 07:48:35

The last line is rhetorical - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:12:27

The last line was written by a nine year old, who doesn't - hokie VT - 4/6 07:29:10

It is but you are asking him to be a little - GODZILLA MU - 4/6 07:22:40

fair - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:26:29

point isn't if should or shouldn't be leaked - fatrat MU - 4/6 06:56:45

I believe wild Bill Clinton paid $800,000 in a court case - hokie VT - 4/6 07:04:25

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard