Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

RE: Why is the SCOTUS leaker a big deal?(nm)

Posted on: April 6, 2023 at 07:32:08 CT

Outsider MU

Posts:

35954

Member For:

19.29 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

It’s yet another example of the left subverting an existing norm or an existing pattern of conduct with the intent of using the media an their followers to intimidate and bully a person or branch of government. Now you see them using the same tactic with a presidential candidate. The same tactic used when sending the IRS after people they don’t like.

Edited by Outsider at 07:37:30 on 04/06/23

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

SCOTUS leaker, chicom balloons, Nashville manifesto. Not - hokie VT - 4/6 06:34:42

RE: SCOTUS leaker, chicom balloons, Nashville manifesto. Not - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 4/6 07:54:45

RE: SCOTUS leaker, chicom balloons, Nashville manifesto. Not - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:13:10

Frankly I'm not concerned - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 4/6 08:14:17

lol coming from a guy who thinks the Russians - Sal CMSU - 4/6 08:15:14

And is ok with the govt mowing down American citizens(nm) - redngray MU - 4/6 08:49:33

He named himself, hoax. Nm - hokie VT - 4/6 08:39:45

Why is the SCOTUS leaker a big deal?(nm) - meatiger MU - 4/6 06:39:52

RE: Why is the SCOTUS leaker a big deal?(nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:32:08

The leaker wasn't from the left. - DC Jayhawk KU - 4/6 08:52:48

RE: The leaker wasn't from the left. - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:59:14

understand, and appreciate the clarity. (nm) - DC Jayhawk KU - 4/6 09:00:08

based off what evidence? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 4/6 08:54:22

The IRS being sent after people is the existing norm. - ummmm MU - 4/6 07:43:09

This is true. It wasn’t prior to Obama. (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:45:08

Incorrect - ummmm MU - 4/6 07:48:03

RE: Incorrect - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:55:48

RE: Why is the SCOTUS leaker a big deal?(nm) - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:36:07

I know, let's dissolve govt totally. Anarchy has always - hokie VT - 4/6 07:50:49

big government has never worked, either - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:54:15

Yippee! Can’t wait, get the corn a poppin. (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:58:56

I agree (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:00:38

RE: Why is the SCOTUS leaker a big deal?(nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:41:32

Good post. Nm - hokie VT - 4/6 08:19:43

If you had an impartial media. Otherwise what you - tman MU - 4/6 07:40:38

if all information is released - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:42:23

Do you really think you’ll see an “impartial” media again… - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:51:39

RE: Do you really think you’ll see an “impartial” media again… - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:55:52

And how does it get released meat? I mean, getting - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:22:31

RE: And how does it get released meat? I mean, getting - meatiger MU - 4/6 08:25:53

Media is not likely to be impartial, but it can at least be - hokie VT - 4/6 07:55:12

media is the propaganda arm of government - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:01:05

RE: Media is not likely to be impartial, but it can at least be - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:56:44

Govt keeping things secret is a problem… - Outsider MU - 4/6 09:17:28

You're arguing two separate things. One is govt hiding - hokie VT - 4/6 08:13:43

RE: You're arguing two separate things. One is govt hiding - meatiger MU - 4/6 08:28:05

If they don't need to be released immediately, why do - hokie VT - 4/6 08:41:07

RE: If they don't need to be released immediately, why do - meatiger MU - 4/6 09:00:59

So you have no issue with holding two conflicting opinions - hokie VT - 4/6 09:03:50

it never has been impartial (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:54:39

Probably not, but they seemed to do a better - Outsider MU - 4/6 09:08:22

they didn't do a better job of it - ashtray UF - 4/6 09:13:24

Why would that be? Nm - hokie VT - 4/6 07:45:52

No it doesnt. It would be no different - GODZILLA MU - 4/6 07:45:05

RE: No it doesnt. It would be no different - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:54:51

There is actual info out now about the - GODZILLA MU - 4/6 07:56:48

RE: There is actual info out now about the - meatiger MU - 4/6 08:02:52

RE: Why is the SCOTUS leaker a big deal?: It wan another - BH O'bonga MU - 4/6 07:18:07

what's the problem with that? - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:28:30

RE: what's the problem with that? - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:35:14

who did the dems attempt to assassinate? (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:42:52

Did you not follow the SCOTUS abortion saga? (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:47:24

do you not answer questions? (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:52:57

Hahaha! Ok, I’ll play. Kavenaugh. Your turn. (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 07:57:21

which Democrat tried to assassinate him? (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:58:40

Did I say a “democrat” tried to assassinate him? (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:08:16

Nicholas Roske(nm) - GODZILLA MU - 4/6 08:00:56

which political office did he hold? (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:01:47

So assassins now have to hold office? (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:09:21

you said "The Dems tried to have him assasinated" - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:14:43

Ok, so when you put things in quotes, that means it - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:29:03

fair enough, but you did imply that the Democrat party - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:30:59

I never implied that at all. I’ll try one more time and you - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:54:18

so that radical faction wouldn't have protested if - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:59:48

Of course all of that would have happened… - Outsider MU - 4/6 09:05:02

did they make a different decision? - ashtray UF - 4/6 09:07:11

Ok. Thanks for the discussion, I’m sure we’ll meet again. (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/6 09:09:29

I guess being a registered - GODZILLA MU - 4/6 08:11:59

Lib definitions like sex, are fluid and can be changed to - hokie VT - 4/6 08:23:45

because in your pea brain any criminal act committed by - ashtray UF - 4/6 08:26:25

That’s not what has been said and perverts the entire - Outsider MU - 4/6 08:33:19

I didn't say that. You implied it (nm) - ashtray UF - 4/6 09:01:14

Because it's another example of our govt not being honest - hokie VT - 4/6 06:43:45

Before they decided you have no right to know who - ashtray UF - 4/6 06:47:05

How is it dishonest - meatiger MU - 4/6 06:46:36

Some things, a small percentage need to be done in private, - hokie VT - 4/6 07:01:02

RE: Some things, a small percentage need to be done in private, - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:04:19

"Right" The demonstrations occurred before the decision - tman MU - 4/6 07:44:13

Oh that is awesome. - GODZILLA MU - 4/6 07:20:55

I explained why the process needs to be done in - hokie VT - 4/6 07:09:02

so I guess government should also decide what information - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:17:55

Open floor debate should not be allowed - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:20:10

You really want supreme court conversations done in an open - hokie VT - 4/6 07:32:01

RE: You really want supreme court conversations done in an open - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:34:53

How about this meat… Let's have all conversations by the - hokie VT - 4/6 07:42:06

why should they have privacy in their conversations? - ashtray UF - 4/6 07:44:03

I would take that vs the current method, yes(nm) - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:43:07

How old are you? No one who has ever worked in an office - hokie VT - 4/6 07:48:35

The last line is rhetorical - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:12:27

The last line was written by a nine year old, who doesn't - hokie VT - 4/6 07:29:10

It is but you are asking him to be a little - GODZILLA MU - 4/6 07:22:40

fair - meatiger MU - 4/6 07:26:29

point isn't if should or shouldn't be leaked - fatrat MU - 4/6 06:56:45

I believe wild Bill Clinton paid $800,000 in a court case - hokie VT - 4/6 07:04:25

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard