Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Well. If someone moved, they are very unlikely

Posted on: May 4, 2022 at 09:41:07 CT
tman MU
Posts:
36289
Member For:
21.75 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
To simply switch to the minority opinion. Rather they would have to write separately, and then you can do a side by side of their changed opinion and pepper them with questions as to what drove their change

Could it happen? Yes. But I see it as being less likely when compared to internal discussion and a singular release of the decision.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

If libs thought leaking the ruling would increases chances - tman MU - 5/4 09:13:56
     Why do you think this was a leak by liberals - DC Jayhawk KU - 5/4 11:55:20
     My cynical bet it's to distract from bidens failures - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/4 10:23:41
          At least you can't rape them, then (nm) - ashtray UF - 5/4 10:30:00
               More projection, gaslighting from boards worse perv - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/4 11:15:57
                    deflect and dance, moron (nm) - ashtray UF - 5/4 12:05:45
     I doubt there was any deliberation and strategy associated - ummmm MU - 5/4 09:40:13
          I had heard this the decision was not to be announced - meatiger MU - 5/4 11:10:36
          when do you think it leaked? The draft was dated Feb 10th - Ace AU - 5/4 09:47:38
               A few days before Politico published it. (nm) - ummmm MU - 5/4 09:57:52
                    So a 3 month old draft? Doubtful it is the only version - Ace AU - 5/4 10:02:21
                         Are you suggesting that SCOTUS moves quickly? - ummmm MU - 5/4 10:04:00
                              Since the opinion would be released by end of term - Ace AU - 5/4 10:27:12
                                   i thought i had read it would be later - meatiger MU - 5/4 11:11:33
                                   Do you know which draft number this one is? (nm) - ummmm MU - 5/4 10:27:59
          Clearly it could have been the act of a lone individual?(nm) - tman MU - 5/4 09:44:08
               Yes. (nm) - ummmm MU - 5/4 09:45:37
     Not too sure about that, Roberts let the mob stop SCOTUS - tigertix MU - 5/4 09:24:19
          That wasn't a leaking of the opinion - tman MU - 5/4 09:30:43
               Its worse.........nm - tigertix MU - 5/4 09:48:55
                    No. Speculating off of oral arguments that are public - tman MU - 5/4 09:51:59
               you sound pretty convinced. - gmmm98 MU - 5/4 09:33:05
                    Worried about Kavanaugh.....nm - tigertix MU - 5/4 09:49:30
                         he's a permanent stain - gmmm98 MU - 5/4 09:56:54
                    Well. If someone moved, they are very unlikely - tman MU - 5/4 09:41:07
                         Right, plus they are sending it to the states.... - tigertix MU - 5/4 09:51:00
     Yes, of the five votes you imagine supporting this - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/4 09:20:06
     all draft opinions should be published. Transparency. - Ace AU - 5/4 09:18:57
          lol why should draft opinions be published? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/4 09:22:38
               why shouldn't they? They already publish transcripts from - Ace AU - 5/4 09:26:01
               because this one is about Roe v Wade - Sal CMSU - 5/4 09:25:44
          that's a retarded take(nm) - dangertim MU - 5/4 09:19:22
               That is too harsh on retardation(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/4 09:20:31




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard