Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

why shouldn't they? They already publish transcripts from

Posted on: May 4, 2022 at 09:26:01 CT
Ace UNC
Posts:
28958
Member For:
6.05 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
oral argument. That usually tips the hand of how the decision may play out. Also, SCOTUS won't grant cert (most of the time) unless they disagree with the lower court opinion, or they feel their line of case law contains a gap that needs filling.

Based on the oral argument for this case, did you find the draft opinion surprising?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

If libs thought leaking the ruling would increases chances - tman MU - 5/4 09:13:56
     Why do you think this was a leak by liberals - DC Jayhawk KU - 5/4 11:55:20
     My cynical bet it's to distract from bidens failures - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/4 10:23:41
          At least you can't rape them, then (nm) - ashtray UF - 5/4 10:30:00
               More projection, gaslighting from boards worse perv - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/4 11:15:57
                    deflect and dance, moron (nm) - ashtray UF - 5/4 12:05:45
     I doubt there was any deliberation and strategy associated - ummmm MU - 5/4 09:40:13
          I had heard this the decision was not to be announced - meatiger MU - 5/4 11:10:36
          when do you think it leaked? The draft was dated Feb 10th - Ace AU - 5/4 09:47:38
               A few days before Politico published it. (nm) - ummmm MU - 5/4 09:57:52
                    So a 3 month old draft? Doubtful it is the only version - Ace AU - 5/4 10:02:21
                         Are you suggesting that SCOTUS moves quickly? - ummmm MU - 5/4 10:04:00
                              Since the opinion would be released by end of term - Ace AU - 5/4 10:27:12
                                   i thought i had read it would be later - meatiger MU - 5/4 11:11:33
                                   Do you know which draft number this one is? (nm) - ummmm MU - 5/4 10:27:59
          Clearly it could have been the act of a lone individual?(nm) - tman MU - 5/4 09:44:08
               Yes. (nm) - ummmm MU - 5/4 09:45:37
     Not too sure about that, Roberts let the mob stop SCOTUS - tigertix MU - 5/4 09:24:19
          That wasn't a leaking of the opinion - tman MU - 5/4 09:30:43
               Its worse.........nm - tigertix MU - 5/4 09:48:55
                    No. Speculating off of oral arguments that are public - tman MU - 5/4 09:51:59
               you sound pretty convinced. - gmmm98 MU - 5/4 09:33:05
                    Worried about Kavanaugh.....nm - tigertix MU - 5/4 09:49:30
                         he's a permanent stain - gmmm98 MU - 5/4 09:56:54
                    Well. If someone moved, they are very unlikely - tman MU - 5/4 09:41:07
                         Right, plus they are sending it to the states.... - tigertix MU - 5/4 09:51:00
     Yes, of the five votes you imagine supporting this - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/4 09:20:06
     all draft opinions should be published. Transparency. - Ace AU - 5/4 09:18:57
          lol why should draft opinions be published? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/4 09:22:38
               why shouldn't they? They already publish transcripts from - Ace AU - 5/4 09:26:01
               because this one is about Roe v Wade - Sal CMSU - 5/4 09:25:44
          that's a retarded take(nm) - dangertim MU - 5/4 09:19:22
               That is too harsh on retardation(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/4 09:20:31




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard