Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Sure it was. It was supposed to say the state doesn't

Posted on: November 8, 2021 at 23:01:31 CT
tman MU
Posts:
36268
Member For:
21.73 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Just get to say guilty based on no evidence and that you have to prove an affirmative defense.

What is different here is that the state aLso has to prove there was no affirmative defense.


The first part is pretty straight forward. The state always has to prove their case. Ut take it however you want

Edited by tman at 23:11:54 on 11/08/21
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Before you orgasm over the Rittenhouse testimony - *M* KC - 11/8 17:09:41
     Others will testify that they were armed. - dangertim BSU - 11/8 18:12:14
     The first one to drop was chasing Rittenhouse, who was - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/8 17:43:15
          RE: The first one to drop was chasing Rittenhouse, who was - *M* KC - 11/8 17:46:07
               well he told KR that he was going to ****ing kill him if he - blake1771 MU - 11/8 18:50:40
                    Yep. He was laying in wait to jump Rittenhouse, who - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/8 18:53:20
               Other testimony from people who were there. Very erratic - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/8 17:57:03
                    Here you go..... - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/8 17:58:41
     Too late(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 11/8 17:28:58
     Choices my friend. When you decide to hunt down another - Outsider MU - 11/8 17:28:16
     But they were armed - mizzouSECedes STL - 11/8 17:24:06
          rosenbaum was not armed. but there is testimony that - blake1771 MU - 11/8 18:53:35
     So 2hat will the only testimony show(nm) - tman MU - 11/8 17:23:58
     The prosecution has not presented a single shred of evidence - 615Tiger STL - 11/8 17:16:48
          The prosecution does not have to prove - *M* KC - 11/8 17:21:42
               Jeebus are as stupid as u r militantly ignorant (nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 11/8 19:57:47
               Whoopsie(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/8 18:44:33
               Beyond reasonable doubt is suddenly not the standard? - Calca STL - 11/8 17:45:45
               I think that's the case with civil but not criminal - ummmm MU - 11/8 17:28:56
                    He has to meet a burden of proof, the degree of which - *M* KC - 11/8 17:40:57
                         But, we're talking about Wisconsin (not the varying rules - ummmm MU - 11/8 18:14:05
                              Nope. The state does get to just say guilty, burden is on - tman MU - 11/8 18:41:03
                                   Not in Wisconsin: - ummmm MU - 11/8 18:43:14
                                        My typos screwed my message. I was trying to say the - tman MU - 11/8 19:09:50
                                             I don't think it was typos. - ummmm MU - 11/8 19:31:41
                                                  Sure it was. It was supposed to say the state doesn't - tman MU - 11/8 23:01:31
               You can look at it that way - 615Tiger STL - 11/8 17:27:49
               Stick to your day job(nm) - tman MU - 11/8 17:24:33
     I haven't seen any evidence to suggest it wasn't self - Sal CMSU - 11/8 17:10:53
          RE: I haven't seen any evidence to suggest it wasn't self - *M* KC - 11/8 17:19:56
               you should stop commenting. you clearly don't know the facts - blake1771 MU - 11/8 18:56:22
               Except that the jury will question the other two charges if - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/8 17:28:10
                    Possibly, but not likely. He will have to prove his - *M* KC - 11/8 17:43:03
                         Someone swinging a skateboard at your head when you are - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/8 18:01:11
                              Meat is not the brightest crayon in the box. He has been - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/8 18:24:13
                                   meat isn't in this thread, idiot (nm) - ashtray UF - 11/8 18:56:30




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard