Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

The first one to drop was chasing Rittenhouse, who was

Posted on: November 8, 2021 at 17:43:15 CT
Tigrrrr! MU
Posts:
262819
Member For:
23.63 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
attempting to retreat when an associate of dumb ass #1 popped a cap or two at Rittenhouse.

And the first guy shot had extremely erratic behavior prior to getting shot.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Before you orgasm over the Rittenhouse testimony - *M* KC - 11/8 17:09:41
     Others will testify that they were armed. - dangertim BSU - 11/8 18:12:14
     The first one to drop was chasing Rittenhouse, who was - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/8 17:43:15
          RE: The first one to drop was chasing Rittenhouse, who was - *M* KC - 11/8 17:46:07
               well he told KR that he was going to ****ing kill him if he - blake1771 MU - 11/8 18:50:40
                    Yep. He was laying in wait to jump Rittenhouse, who - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/8 18:53:20
               Other testimony from people who were there. Very erratic - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/8 17:57:03
                    Here you go..... - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/8 17:58:41
     Too late(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 11/8 17:28:58
     Choices my friend. When you decide to hunt down another - Outsider MU - 11/8 17:28:16
     But they were armed - mizzouSECedes STL - 11/8 17:24:06
          rosenbaum was not armed. but there is testimony that - blake1771 MU - 11/8 18:53:35
     So 2hat will the only testimony show(nm) - tman MU - 11/8 17:23:58
     The prosecution has not presented a single shred of evidence - 615Tiger STL - 11/8 17:16:48
          The prosecution does not have to prove - *M* KC - 11/8 17:21:42
               Jeebus are as stupid as u r militantly ignorant (nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 11/8 19:57:47
               Whoopsie(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/8 18:44:33
               Beyond reasonable doubt is suddenly not the standard? - Calca STL - 11/8 17:45:45
               I think that's the case with civil but not criminal - ummmm MU - 11/8 17:28:56
                    He has to meet a burden of proof, the degree of which - *M* KC - 11/8 17:40:57
                         But, we're talking about Wisconsin (not the varying rules - ummmm MU - 11/8 18:14:05
                              Nope. The state does get to just say guilty, burden is on - tman MU - 11/8 18:41:03
                                   Not in Wisconsin: - ummmm MU - 11/8 18:43:14
                                        My typos screwed my message. I was trying to say the - tman MU - 11/8 19:09:50
                                             I don't think it was typos. - ummmm MU - 11/8 19:31:41
                                                  Sure it was. It was supposed to say the state doesn't - tman MU - 11/8 23:01:31
               You can look at it that way - 615Tiger STL - 11/8 17:27:49
               Stick to your day job(nm) - tman MU - 11/8 17:24:33
     I haven't seen any evidence to suggest it wasn't self - Sal CMSU - 11/8 17:10:53
          RE: I haven't seen any evidence to suggest it wasn't self - *M* KC - 11/8 17:19:56
               you should stop commenting. you clearly don't know the facts - blake1771 MU - 11/8 18:56:22
               Except that the jury will question the other two charges if - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/8 17:28:10
                    Possibly, but not likely. He will have to prove his - *M* KC - 11/8 17:43:03
                         Someone swinging a skateboard at your head when you are - Tigrrrr! MU - 11/8 18:01:11
                              Meat is not the brightest crayon in the box. He has been - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/8 18:24:13
                                   meat isn't in this thread, idiot (nm) - ashtray UF - 11/8 18:56:30




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard