Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Did you somehow miss the first two paragraphs of that link?

Posted on: January 30, 2020 at 13:40:27 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
51160
Member For:
16.87 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
“There may an expectation by federal employees that if they report fraud, a crime, waste or other improper practices within the federal government that their identities will remain anonymous.

Actually, this is not necessarily the case. No federal law exists that entitles whistleblowers the statutory right to remain anonymous—no matter what their government position, location of employment or the nature of the alleged improper incident.”

No one has asked the IG to identify the WB and nothing is stopping anyone else from disclosing their identity.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Why do so many think WB protection involves anonymity? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 12:55:16
     The Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:09:30
          And actually you're wrong all around - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 13:22:45
               I'm referencing this link - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:34:44
                    That guy is obviously wrong - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 13:51:29
                         Then why aren't the R's on the committee releasing - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:54:58
                              I don't know, I simply pointed out the Act does not - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 13:58:24
                         Why would it matter anyway? No one is asking the IG for the - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/30 13:53:15
                              I haven't said it does(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:56:14
                    Did you somehow miss the first two paragraphs of that link? - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/30 13:40:27
                         No. I listed the paragraphs that answer the OP ? and - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:46:49
          I worked within that community and you're correct on the IG - miz_zou MU - 1/30 13:17:17
          That doesn't say anything about anonymity - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 13:15:11
               Didn't say that it prevented anyone else from disclosing - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:21:34
          Rand Paul is not the IG. There is nothing in the statute - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/30 13:13:08
               It's an act and does specifically say the IG has to protect - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:27:57
                    So there is no valid reason for schiff to withhold - tman MU - 1/30 13:30:26
                         There is no law against it-doesn't mean he doesn't have - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:37:48
                              He has no valid reason. Just like the libs have no - tman MU - 1/30 13:41:58
                                   I just offered an opinion you can disagree - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:51:56
                    It absolutely does not - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 13:29:47
     To protect Schiff, and to hide the horrible bias of the WB. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/30 13:05:03
     No one is saying that. The reason the GOP wants to out - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:04:36
          Retaliation is against the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:12:56
               What reason, other than retaliation, - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:23:50
                    So we can know if Schiff is telling the truth with regard - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:35:02
                         It won't matter to - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/30 13:50:48
               What do you think the - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/30 13:22:20
          Bullshlt! The WB was the genesis of this impeachment. The - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/30 13:07:54
          Nope. That's their false claim. Real answer is above. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/30 13:07:35
          Similar to Dems with Bolton? - JayRoy KC - 1/30 13:06:43
     Why wouldn't it by its very nature? - raskolnikov MU - 1/30 13:03:51
          whistleblowing is not “by nature” anonymous (nm) - pickle MU - 1/30 13:34:34
               Short on your vocab are you son? - raskolnikov MU - 1/30 14:57:23
          And it would be against the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:13:34
               Because Trump's attorneys are arguing in court right now - KenMan33 MU - 1/30 13:25:16
                    What has he done that would be against the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:27:00
                         Trump's attorney (Dershowitz) is arguing that when the - KenMan33 MU - 1/30 13:39:20
                              But what has he DONE that is against the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:41:01
                                   The impoundment control act of 1974(nm) - KenMan33 MU - 1/30 13:43:58
                                        No - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:45:16
                                             nice argument against it "no." i got to get back to work - KenMan33 MU - 1/30 13:48:37
                                                  Sic burn bro - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:50:29
                                        he doesn't care. He's a sychophant (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:45:04
                                             That isn't true - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:45:39
                         soliciting foreign help to influence USA elections (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:27:23
                              When did he do that? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:32:47
                                   he's still doing it. - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:33:39
                                        How was the House obstructed? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:34:09
                                             I don't need to play this game with you. - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:35:30
                                                  The law isn't a game - it is means something - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:36:22
                                                       He's broken the law. You and other sycophants don't care(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:41:28
                                                            He hasn't - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:46:14
                                                                 he has, but a crime is not required for impeachment (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:46:38
                                                                      So he has committed crimes - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:48:22
     Because the libs here don’t know how to use Google.(nm) - Emoji Man MSU - 1/30 13:00:36
     Because the Dems and their media lapdogs keep saying it. - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/30 12:58:21
     Because the libs here don't know how to use Google.(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 12:57:06
     Because that's what the Dems have endlessly repeated - Spanky KU - 1/30 12:57:03




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard