Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

The Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act

Posted on: January 30, 2020 at 13:09:30 CT
Mo Texan MU
Posts:
20130
Member For:
22.22 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
1998 requires the inspector general to keep a whistleblower’s name confidential. It doesn't speak to allowing the IG any exceptions for that. Just guessing, but that is the only rule I can think of which would require the House to remain silent and also why the IG deposition isn't being released.

Edited by Mo Texan at 13:10:07 on 01/30/20
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Why do so many think WB protection involves anonymity? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 12:55:16
     The Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:09:30
          And actually you're wrong all around - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 13:22:45
               I'm referencing this link - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:34:44
                    That guy is obviously wrong - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 13:51:29
                         Then why aren't the R's on the committee releasing - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:54:58
                              I don't know, I simply pointed out the Act does not - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 13:58:24
                         Why would it matter anyway? No one is asking the IG for the - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/30 13:53:15
                              I haven't said it does(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:56:14
                    Did you somehow miss the first two paragraphs of that link? - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/30 13:40:27
                         No. I listed the paragraphs that answer the OP ? and - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:46:49
          I worked within that community and you're correct on the IG - miz_zou MU - 1/30 13:17:17
          That doesn't say anything about anonymity - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 13:15:11
               Didn't say that it prevented anyone else from disclosing - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:21:34
          Rand Paul is not the IG. There is nothing in the statute - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/30 13:13:08
               It's an act and does specifically say the IG has to protect - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:27:57
                    So there is no valid reason for schiff to withhold - tman MU - 1/30 13:30:26
                         There is no law against it-doesn't mean he doesn't have - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:37:48
                              He has no valid reason. Just like the libs have no - tman MU - 1/30 13:41:58
                                   I just offered an opinion you can disagree - Mo Texan MU - 1/30 13:51:56
                    It absolutely does not - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 13:29:47
     To protect Schiff, and to hide the horrible bias of the WB. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/30 13:05:03
     No one is saying that. The reason the GOP wants to out - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:04:36
          Retaliation is against the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:12:56
               What reason, other than retaliation, - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:23:50
                    So we can know if Schiff is telling the truth with regard - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:35:02
                         It won't matter to - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/30 13:50:48
               What do you think the - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/30 13:22:20
          Bullshlt! The WB was the genesis of this impeachment. The - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/30 13:07:54
          Nope. That's their false claim. Real answer is above. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/30 13:07:35
          Similar to Dems with Bolton? - JayRoy KC - 1/30 13:06:43
     Why wouldn't it by its very nature? - raskolnikov MU - 1/30 13:03:51
          whistleblowing is not “by nature” anonymous (nm) - pickle MU - 1/30 13:34:34
               Short on your vocab are you son? - raskolnikov MU - 1/30 14:57:23
          And it would be against the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:13:34
               Because Trump's attorneys are arguing in court right now - KenMan33 MU - 1/30 13:25:16
                    What has he done that would be against the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:27:00
                         Trump's attorney (Dershowitz) is arguing that when the - KenMan33 MU - 1/30 13:39:20
                              But what has he DONE that is against the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:41:01
                                   The impoundment control act of 1974(nm) - KenMan33 MU - 1/30 13:43:58
                                        No - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:45:16
                                             nice argument against it "no." i got to get back to work - KenMan33 MU - 1/30 13:48:37
                                                  Sic burn bro - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:50:29
                                        he doesn't care. He's a sychophant (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:45:04
                                             That isn't true - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:45:39
                         soliciting foreign help to influence USA elections (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:27:23
                              When did he do that? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:32:47
                                   he's still doing it. - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:33:39
                                        How was the House obstructed? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:34:09
                                             I don't need to play this game with you. - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:35:30
                                                  The law isn't a game - it is means something - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:36:22
                                                       He's broken the law. You and other sycophants don't care(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:41:28
                                                            He hasn't - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:46:14
                                                                 he has, but a crime is not required for impeachment (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/30 13:46:38
                                                                      So he has committed crimes - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/30 13:48:22
     Because the libs here don’t know how to use Google.(nm) - Emoji Man MSU - 1/30 13:00:36
     Because the Dems and their media lapdogs keep saying it. - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/30 12:58:21
     Because the libs here don't know how to use Google.(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/30 12:57:06
     Because that's what the Dems have endlessly repeated - Spanky KU - 1/30 12:57:03




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard