Welcome Guest

I've always known that

Posted on: January 6, 2020 at 15:05:27 CT

ashtray UF

Posts:

111045

Member For:

22.66 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

I admitted to you that I misspoke and said Senate inquiry instead of House inquiry and you have clanged to that like a hairy-ass dingle berry ever since. You not only look childish, but stupid, too. Congratulations.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

little Marco explains impeachment to crazy nancy and cryin - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/6 13:43:43

ok, I'll admit my ignorance here, what is this based on? - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/6 13:45:48

The Clinton impeachment trial for one(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/6 13:48:56

That's not true - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 1/6 13:55:16

What witnesses testified before the Senate? - Spanky KU - 1/7 13:04:24

That is not the same as witness testimony - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/6 13:57:55

lol (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 1/6 13:58:30

do you think playing a video taped deposition that - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/6 14:01:43

GJ witness testimony was also presented. Mitch fears opening - Mo Texan MU - 1/6 14:27:58

It's a damn sight closer than not having any witness - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 1/6 14:03:05

And yet they see index to have these after the evidence - tman MU - 1/6 15:01:16

but the Senate began Nixon's inquiry - ashtray UF - 1/6 13:54:35

False - Spanky KU - 1/6 15:02:09

The Senate began the Nixon inquiry - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/6 13:55:53

it started in the Senate - ashtray UF - 1/6 13:59:33

Was the trial open(nm) - tman MU - 1/6 15:01:50

what trial? (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/6 15:02:13

Glad to know you have learned that there wasnt one(nm) - tman MU - 1/6 15:03:10

I've always known that - ashtray UF - 1/6 15:05:27

You felt so compelled to change you post months later - tman MU - 1/6 15:11:10

I changed it because you wouldn't let it go - ashtray UF - 1/6 15:13:04