Welcome Guest

That's not true

Posted on: January 6, 2020 at 13:55:16 CT
TigerJackSwartz MU
Posts:
64230
Member For:
17.47 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
On January 25, Senator Robert Byrd moved for dismissals of both articles of impeachment for lack of merit. On the following day, Representative Bryant moved to call witnesses to the trial, a question the Senate had scrupulously avoided to that point. In both cases, the Senate voted to deliberate on the question in private session, rather than public, televised procedure. On January 27, the Senate voted on both motions in public session; the motion to dismiss failed on a nearly party line vote of 56–44, while the motion to depose witnesses passed by the same margin. A day later, the Senate voted down motions to move directly to a vote on the articles of impeachment and to suppress videotaped depositions of the witnesses from public release, Senator Russ Feingold again voting with the Republicans.

Over three days, February 1–3, House managers took videotaped closed-door depositions from Monica Lewinsky, Clinton's friend Vernon Jordan, and White House aide Sidney Blumenthal. On February 4, however, the Senate voted 70–30 that excerpting these videotapes would suffice as testimony, rather than calling live witnesses to appear at trial. The videos were played in the Senate on February 6, featuring 30 excerpts of Lewinsky discussing her affidavit in the Paula Jones case, the hiding of small gifts Clinton had given her, and his involvement in procurement of a job for Lewinsky.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

little Marco explains impeachment to crazy nancy and cryin - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/6 13:43:43
     ok, I'll admit my ignorance here, what is this based on? - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/6 13:45:48
          The Clinton impeachment trial for one(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/6 13:48:56
               That's not true - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/6 13:55:16
                    What witnesses testified before the Senate? - Spanky KU - 1/7 13:04:24
                    That is not the same as witness testimony - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/6 13:57:55
                         lol (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/6 13:58:30
                              do you think playing a video taped deposition that - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/6 14:01:43
                                   GJ witness testimony was also presented. Mitch fears opening - Mo Texan MU - 1/6 14:27:58
                                   It's a damn sight closer than not having any witness - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/6 14:03:05
                                        And yet they see index to have these after the evidence - tman MU - 1/6 15:01:16
               but the Senate began Nixon's inquiry - ashtray UF - 1/6 13:54:35
                    False - Spanky KU - 1/6 15:02:09
                    The Senate began the Nixon inquiry - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/6 13:55:53
                         it started in the Senate - ashtray UF - 1/6 13:59:33
                              Was the trial open(nm) - tman MU - 1/6 15:01:50
                                   what trial? (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/6 15:02:13
                                        Glad to know you have learned that there wasnt one(nm) - tman MU - 1/6 15:03:10
                                             I've always known that - ashtray UF - 1/6 15:05:27
                                                  You felt so compelled to change you post months later - tman MU - 1/6 15:11:10
                                                       I changed it because you wouldn't let it go - ashtray UF - 1/6 15:13:04




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard