Welcome Guest

It's a damn sight closer than not having any witness

Posted on: January 6, 2020 at 14:03:05 CT

TigerJackSwartz MU

Posts:

64230

Member For:

17.47 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

testimony at all, like McConnell wants to do.

And it was in response to a motion to have witness testimony.

To say "the Clinton Impeachment Trial had no witness testimony" is absurd and a bald faced lie

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

little Marco explains impeachment to crazy nancy and cryin - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/6 13:43:43

ok, I'll admit my ignorance here, what is this based on? - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/6 13:45:48

The Clinton impeachment trial for one(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/6 13:48:56

That's not true - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 1/6 13:55:16

What witnesses testified before the Senate? - Spanky KU - 1/7 13:04:24

That is not the same as witness testimony - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/6 13:57:55

lol (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 1/6 13:58:30

do you think playing a video taped deposition that - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/6 14:01:43

GJ witness testimony was also presented. Mitch fears opening - Mo Texan MU - 1/6 14:27:58

It's a damn sight closer than not having any witness - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 1/6 14:03:05

And yet they see index to have these after the evidence - tman MU - 1/6 15:01:16

but the Senate began Nixon's inquiry - ashtray UF - 1/6 13:54:35

False - Spanky KU - 1/6 15:02:09

The Senate began the Nixon inquiry - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/6 13:55:53

it started in the Senate - ashtray UF - 1/6 13:59:33

Was the trial open(nm) - tman MU - 1/6 15:01:50

what trial? (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/6 15:02:13

Glad to know you have learned that there wasnt one(nm) - tman MU - 1/6 15:03:10

I've always known that - ashtray UF - 1/6 15:05:27

You felt so compelled to change you post months later - tman MU - 1/6 15:11:10

I changed it because you wouldn't let it go - ashtray UF - 1/6 15:13:04